Skip to main content

Security report for laykeymanager.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.laykeymanager.com appears to be a minimal service portal designed to allow users to input a key or email to retrieve information and download files. The site uses modern frontend technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection. However, the site lacks critical business and security information such as privacy policies, terms of service, contact details, and WHOIS registration data, which raises concerns about its legitimacy and trustworthiness. The absence of WHOIS data suggests the domain may be unregistered or privacy protected, which is unusual for a business-facing website. Security posture is basic with no visible security headers and limited compliance indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laykeymanager.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention laykeymanager.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for laykeymanager.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model appears to be a digital service platform requiring user keys or emails to access certain files or information. The target audience is users who possess such keys or emails. There is no clear indication of company identity, market position, or partnerships. The lack of contact information and policies limits the ability to assess business credibility or growth potential. The site’s minimal content and lack of trust signals suggest it is either a new or low-profile service with limited market presence.

Security posture

Security measures are minimal. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via HTTPS) and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot mitigation. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the security posture is weak and could expose users to risks if sensitive data is handled.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add clear contact information including business address, phone, and email to enhance credibility.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS registration data or ensure domain registration is properly completed and visible.
  5. Establish an incident response process and publish relevant contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website offers a service to get key information and download files by submitting a key or email.
Key services
Key info retrieval, File downloads
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Vercel Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • Input field with focus and ring styling for accessibility

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and focused on a single form for key or email input.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or company details are provided.
  4. No security headers or SSL details visible in provided data.
  5. No WHOIS registration data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  6. Use of modern frontend technologies (Next.js, React) and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise.
  7. No external social media or business-related links found.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Website appears to be a simple utility or service portal with limited information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with a modern React/Next.js stack and hosted on Vercel, indicating a contemporary technical infrastructure. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and use of CDN-backed hosting. Mobile optimization is good based on viewport meta tags and responsive styling. However, SEO optimization is basic with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present in form input styling. The lack of CMS or backend details limits further technical assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is adequate but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laykeymanager.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laykeymanager.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.