Skip to main content

Security report for lancs.ac.uk

Lancaster University · Education · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lancaster University is a well-established higher education institution in the United Kingdom, recognized as a top 10 UK university with a strong international reputation. The website clearly targets prospective and current students, staff, and research partners, offering comprehensive information on undergraduate, postgraduate, and research programs, as well as online learning options. The university maintains a strong market position with notable rankings and sustainability achievements. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Foundation, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. The site includes a robust cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses secure cookie attributes, and avoids exposing sensitive data, although it lacks explicit security policy and incident response contact pages. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, reflecting the university's reputable status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lancs.ac.uk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lancaster University operates in the education sector, providing a broad range of academic programs and research services. Its business model centers on tuition, research funding, and partnerships. The university's competitive advantages include high rankings, comprehensive student support, and a strong global presence, including a dedicated Chinese language site. The partnership ecosystem includes portals for students and staff, enhancing engagement and service delivery. Growth indicators include active promotion of clearing events and sustainability initiatives. The website content and structure support clear communication of offerings and institutional values.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure cookie handling, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information. The cookie consent banner is comprehensive and respects user choices, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. Security headers are not explicitly detected, suggesting room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lancaster University
Description
Lancaster University is among the best in the UK. A Top 15 university in the UK league tables, also highly ranked internationally such as QS World Rankings.
Key services
Undergraduate study, Postgraduate study, Postgraduate research, Online courses, Research services, Student support and wellbeing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Adobe Accessible Mega Menu, Slick Carousel, Foundation 6.5.3, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of SameSite=strict for cookies
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on education and research services.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Social media presence is extensive and official.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security flaws detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including jQuery 3.5.1, Foundation framework, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Hosting details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and formalizing security documentation would improve the technical maturity and risk posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lancs.ac.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lancs.ac.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.