Skip to main content

Security report for lanaco.com

LANACO · Technology · Bosnia and Herzegovina

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LANACO is a well-established technology company based in Bosnia and Herzegovina, specializing in innovative software solutions, platforms, data infrastructure, communication systems, cloud services, hosting, and education. The company targets business and technology users in the region, offering a diversified portfolio that positions it as a key player in the local technology market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and compliance with privacy regulations including GDPR. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. The absence of public WHOIS data slightly reduces trust but is offset by consistent branding and active social media engagement. Overall, LANACO presents a credible and professional online presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lanaco.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LANACO operates in the technology sector with a focus on software and IT infrastructure services. Its business model includes product development, cloud and hosting services, and educational offerings, catering to enterprises and institutions. The company maintains partnerships and subsidiaries reflected in multiple linked domains, enhancing its ecosystem. Market positioning is strong regionally, supported by a comprehensive website and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, cloud hosting, and training programs. The company demonstrates growth potential through diversified services and digital maturity. Strategic partnerships with related technology firms and hosting providers strengthen its market presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR, indicating a baseline compliance with privacy and security standards. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. The absence of a published security policy or incident response page limits transparency in security governance. No security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure mechanism was found, which could improve trust and incident handling. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational practices but opportunities exist to elevate security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for staff to foster a security-aware culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LANACO
Description
LANACO je kompanija koja kreira inovativna rješenja bazirana na korišćenju tehnologije posljednje generacije, koja se u potpunosti prilagođava potrebama i zahtjevima krajnjeg korisnika.
Key services
Software solutions, Software platforms, Data infrastructure, Communication systems, Cloud services, Hosting, Education and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Font Awesome, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements
  3. Multiple external and partner domains linked
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  5. No WHOIS data available publicly, which is unusual for a .com domain
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel for user behavior tracking and marketing insights. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed through optimization of scripts and images. The technical stack is standard for enterprise websites, balancing functionality and maintainability. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lanaco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lanaco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.