Skip to main content

Security report for lamael.cz

Lamael · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lamael.cz is a business-focused website representing Lamael, a company founded in 2017 that offers a mobile application for business management. The website targets business users seeking efficient management tools, positioning itself as a niche player in the technology sector within the Czech Republic. The site is built on WordPress using the Thrive Theme and incorporates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lack explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is professional and well-branded, though it could improve transparency and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lamael.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS/mobile app solutions for business management. Its market positioning is regional and specialized, focusing on small to medium-sized enterprises. The business model likely revolves around subscription or app-based revenue streams. The website demonstrates consistent branding and active engagement with social media platforms, enhancing its market presence. However, the absence of direct contact information and formal policy documents may limit trust and customer confidence. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in security transparency. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve credibility.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lamael
Description
Vaše firma v kapse
Key services
business management mobile application
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Thrive Theme, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Google reCAPTCHA, ActiveCampaign, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Seznam RC.js
Frameworks
Thrive Visual Editor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Use of security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Seznam tracking
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight Tag, Seznam tracking
Marketing tools
ActiveCampaign, Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based business site for Lamael, a business management app.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with moderate confidence.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, indicating active user tracking.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  6. Social media presence is confirmed via structured data with links to Facebook, Twitter (X), LinkedIn, Pinterest, and YouTube.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  9. No obvious security headers detected in the provided data.
  10. Content is professional and business-focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Thrive Theme and uses several modern marketing and analytics technologies, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Microsoft Clarity, and ActiveCampaign. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification evident. However, the site lacks some accessibility features and security headers. The domain is hosted by REG-ZONER, consistent with the regional focus. There is room for technical modernization by improving security configurations and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lamael.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lamael.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.