Skip to main content

Security report for ladokkonsortiet.se

Ladokkonsortiet · Education · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ladokkonsortiet operates as a consortium focused on the development and support of the Ladok system, a critical student administration platform used by Swedish higher education institutions. The website serves as an information hub for updates, services, meetings, and instructions related to Ladok, targeting educational institutions and students in Sweden. The organization appears to be relatively new, founded in 2023, with a medium-sized operational scale and a clear focus on education sector IT services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern plugins such as Complianz for GDPR compliance and Ari Fancy Lightbox for UI enhancements. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes a cookie consent mechanism aligned with EU regulations. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent controls, but lacks DNSSEC and some advanced security headers. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's Swedish origin and business purpose, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, Ladokkonsortiet's website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving its target audience effectively. Strategic improvements in DNS security and security headers could further enhance its security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ladokkonsortiet.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ladokkonsortiet holds a key position in the Swedish higher education IT ecosystem, providing essential services around the Ladok student administration system. Its consortium model suggests collaboration among multiple educational institutions. The website reflects a focus on transparency and user engagement through regular updates, event calendars, and detailed service descriptions. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled communication approach, likely directing users to specific contact pages. The partnership ecosystem includes official Ladok domains and university IT service portals, indicating strong institutional ties. Growth indicators include active news updates and event scheduling, supporting ongoing development and user support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy) represents areas for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting external security collaboration. The use of reputable plugins and limited third-party scripts reduces attack surface. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively but could benefit from enhanced DNS and header security measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ladokkonsortiet
Description
Ladokkonsortiet is an organization focused on the development, support, and coordination of the Ladok system, which is used by Swedish universities and colleges for student administration. The website provides information about current developments, services, meetings, and instructions related to Ladok.
Key services
Ladok system development, Support and training, Information dissemination, Coordination of upgrades and releases
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Ari Fancy Lightbox, Complianz GDPR plugin, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish with an English section.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins for GDPR compliance and UI.
  4. No exposed emails or phone numbers found in the HTML; contact is via contact pages.
  5. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user controls.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  10. Website is well-structured with clear navigation and multiple menus.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a clean and responsive design. It uses jQuery and Ari Fancy Lightbox for enhanced UI components and Complianz GDPR plugin for privacy compliance. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics. The site loads with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are evident with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting details are not explicit but the domain registrar is Loopia AB, a reputable Swedish provider. The site shows no signs of technical debt or deprecated technologies but could improve by adopting DNSSEC and additional security headers to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ladokkonsortiet.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ladokkonsortiet.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.