Skip to main content

Security report for labelbox.com

Labelbox · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Labelbox is a technology company specializing in providing a SaaS platform for AI teams to build, operate, and staff their data factories. The company offers data labeling and management software designed to streamline the creation of training data for machine learning models. Positioned as an established player in the AI data labeling market, Labelbox targets AI teams, data scientists, and enterprises seeking scalable data operations solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear messaging about its services. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, supported by a robust analytics and marketing stack such as Google Analytics, Marketo, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable performance and security. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a solid SSL configuration and includes a Content-Security-Policy header. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and additional security headers could enhance protection. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including a consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, Labelbox presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a mature technical infrastructure and solid security posture. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, enhancing security headers, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching labelbox.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Labelbox operates in the AI technology sector, offering data labeling and management solutions as a SaaS platform. Its business model focuses on providing software and services to AI teams and enterprises, enabling efficient training data workflows. The company benefits from a strong market position with a history dating back to 2003, indicating stability and experience. The website's integration with multiple marketing and analytics platforms suggests active customer engagement and data-driven growth strategies. While no parent or subsidiary companies were identified, Labelbox maintains partnerships with various analytics and marketing service providers. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the website may indicate a preference for contact via forms or controlled channels.

Security posture

Labelbox demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and a Content-Security-Policy header implemented. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain security. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap. The website uses reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing, which are integrated with cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations. No direct security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional published policies and enhanced DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider providing direct verified contact emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Labelbox
Description
Labelbox delivers the software and services to help you build, operate, or staff your data factory
Key services
Data labeling software, Data management platform, AI training data operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, jQuery, Prism.js, Marketo, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Intercom, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Segment, Marketo, LinkedIn Insight Tag, LogRocket
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Quora Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Segment, LogRocket, Marketo, Intercom, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Marketo, Bizible, Intercom, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  3. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities found
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content
  5. Security headers present but could be improved
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain age is consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, with extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Marketo, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure support. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic, indicating potential for improvement. The use of cookie consent tools like Cookiebot demonstrates attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the business objectives effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with labelbox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review labelbox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.