Skip to main content

Security report for lab.mobi

Mobi Lab OU · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mobi Lab OU is an established Estonian technology company specializing in designing and building mobile and augmented reality products. Founded in 2001, the company serves a diverse clientele including renowned tech businesses such as Microsoft, Skype, Ericsson, and Bolt. Their service offerings encompass business design, product management, digital product design, software engineering, and CTO as a Service, targeting SMEs, creative agencies, and product companies. The company positions itself as a trusted partner for innovative digital solutions with a strong market presence in the technology sector. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cloudflare DNS services. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, with a fast loading experience and good accessibility features. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, Google reCAPTCHA on forms, and a cookie consent mechanism, although some security headers and DNSSEC are not implemented. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates a good posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected. However, it lacks a published privacy policy, terms of service, and explicit security or incident response policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. The domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, with a long domain age and registrant details matching the website's business claims. Overall, Mobi Lab's website reflects a professional and credible business with strong technical infrastructure and moderate privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation, security headers, and DNS security would enhance their security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lab.mobi

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mobi Lab operates in the technology sector with a focus on mobile and augmented reality product development. Their competitive advantage lies in a comprehensive service portfolio from business design to software engineering and CTO as a Service, supported by a strong client base including global tech leaders. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and creative agencies seeking innovative digital solutions. Growth indicators include active project showcases, participation in EU projects, and a visible marketing presence across multiple social media platforms. The company maintains a consistent branding strategy and leverages partnerships with major technology providers. Their market positioning is that of a trusted, medium-sized technology partner with a strong foothold in Northern Europe.

Security posture

The security maturity of Mobi Lab's website is good but not comprehensive. HTTPS is enforced, and clientTransferProhibited domain status protects against unauthorized domain transfers. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact forms and a cookie consent banner indicates awareness of security and privacy best practices. However, the absence of DNSSEC, missing security headers like Content-Security-Policy, and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, which could impact trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy including incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms and ensure full compliance with privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mobi Lab OU
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mobi Lab OU
Description
From UX/UI mobile design, Native or Flutter app development as well as AR products and CTO as a Service, Mobi Lab delivers mobile and augmented reality solutions.
Key services
Business design, Product management, Digital product design, Software engineering, CTO as a Service, Augmented Reality solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieYes cookie consent, Webflow CMS, Typekit fonts, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Google Ads
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is rich with detailed service descriptions and case studies
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  6. Security best practices are partially implemented but can be improved
  7. No visible security or vulnerability disclosure policies
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using Webflow CMS, Cloudflare DNS, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Google Ads. The site uses Typekit fonts and jQuery for frontend enhancements. Performance is optimized with fast loading times and mobile responsiveness. The technical stack is well-maintained with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Hosting appears reliable with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. Opportunities exist to improve security configurations and privacy documentation to reduce technical risks and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lab.mobi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lab.mobi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.