Skip to main content

Security report for l4.pm

Technology · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website l4.pm is a personal portfolio and hobbyist project site operated by an individual known as Luna (LUN-4). It primarily showcases backend development work for partners such as anlatan.ai and novelai.net, alongside open source projects related to virtual reality and personal interests like music and blogging. The site is small-scale, targeting technology enthusiasts and VR communities, with no commercial business model or formal market positioning. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and SVG graphics, hosted on Hetzner, and demonstrates moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is minimal, with no visible security headers or published policies, and no evidence of HTTPS status was found in the provided data. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Content includes mild adult-themed warnings but no explicit adult content. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the personal nature of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching l4.pm

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a personal digital presence rather than a commercial entity, focusing on backend development contributions and open source VR projects. Its market positioning is niche and informal, with no clear revenue streams or formal partnerships beyond mentions of related projects. The target audience includes VR enthusiasts, open source contributors, and personal blog readers. The site owner maintains a presence on GitHub and links to various external domains related to their work. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are limited, reflecting the site's hobbyist nature.

Security posture

Security maturity is low, with no published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of security headers and unclear SSL/TLS status represent potential risks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerabilities were detected in the content, but the lack of formal security controls and compliance documentation suggests limited security governance. The site would benefit from implementing HTTPS, security headers, and formal privacy and cookie policies to improve its security posture and compliance with GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to enhance GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information with dedicated security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of an individual named Luna (LUN-4) showcasing backend development work, open source projects, and personal interests such as music and virtual reality.
Key services
backend development for anlatan.ai and novelai.net, open source VR-related projects, content creation and blogging
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, SVG
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal portfolio and hobbyist project site for an individual named Luna.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact is available via a contact page but no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Site contains some mild adult-themed warnings but no explicit adult content.
  5. No security policies or incident response information published.
  6. No analytics or advertising detected.
  7. Site hosted on Hetzner with custom SVG logo and basic styling.
  8. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected.
  9. No security headers or advanced security measures observed.
  10. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well maintained.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple tech stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, and SVG for graphics, without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting is provided by Hetzner, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal but includes basic meta tags and Open Graph properties. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking technologies, which limits data collection but also reduces privacy concerns. The site is well-structured but could benefit from modernization and improved technical controls to enhance security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with l4.pm. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review l4.pm.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.