Skip to main content

Security report for krea.com

KREA DIGITAL s.r.o. · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KREA DIGITAL s.r.o. is a Slovak-based IT company specializing in the development of web and mobile applications, IT outsourcing, and business system solutions. With over 14 years of experience, the company serves a diverse client base including notable brands, positioning itself as a reliable IT partner for custom software development and IT professional outsourcing. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and hCaptcha, ensuring responsive design and user-friendly navigation. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and CAPTCHA integration on forms, although explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and GDPR adherence. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Overall, the company presents a credible and professional digital presence with room for enhanced security transparency and WHOIS data clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krea.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KREA operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT consulting, custom software development, and IT outsourcing. Its business model revolves around delivering tailored IT solutions and staffing services to businesses globally. The company leverages a partner ecosystem, notably promoting Sortio as a complementary business system. The presence of multiple client logos and a company blog indicates active market engagement and content marketing efforts. The company targets businesses with IT project needs and reasonable budgets, emphasizing long-term cooperation. Growth indicators include a 14-year operational history and a portfolio of diverse clients. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to strengthen trust through enhanced domain transparency and published security policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of hCaptcha to mitigate spam on contact forms. Cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could benefit from formalized security documentation and technical header enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KREA DIGITAL s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KREA DIGITAL s.r.o.
Description
Slovak based IT company creating web applications, mobile applications and information systems.
Key services
Development of web and mobile applications, Outsourcing of developers and IT professionals, All-in-one business system (Sortio)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, hCaptcha, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Fancybox, jQuery UI
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of hCaptcha on forms to prevent spam
  • Consent management for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive forms.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Multiple contact forms with CAPTCHA for spam protection.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, LinkedIn.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  7. Website uses modern frontend technologies and responsive design.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  9. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and hCaptcha for bot protection. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site loads CSS asynchronously for performance optimization and includes accessibility features such as responsive navigation and form validation. However, accessibility compliance is basic and could be improved. The site performance is moderate with some loading animations and preloader elements. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience with opportunities for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krea.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krea.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.