Skip to main content

Security report for kpmgdatafestival.cz

Education · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Data Festival VŠE 2025 is an educational event website focused on workshops, lectures, and networking in the data science domain. The site targets students, professionals, and enthusiasts interested in data-related topics, primarily in the Czech Republic. The business model revolves around event organization and educational services. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and user experience, although accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, posing a moderate risk. Overall, the site is professional and safe but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kpmgdatafestival.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as an educational event platform within the data science and technology sector, targeting a niche audience of students and professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in offering workshops, lectures, and networking opportunities, which are key services for knowledge sharing and community building. The business model is event-centric, likely generating revenue through registrations or sponsorships. The site uses common CMS and analytics platforms, indicating a standard digital maturity level. The lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests a small-scale operation or an event-specific site. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential depends on expanding event offerings and improving digital trust signals.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are essential for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations, which could expose the business to legal risks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add essential security headers to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update all CMS components and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Data Festival VŠE 2025 is an event focused on workshops, lectures, and networking related to data topics.
Key services
Workshops, Lectures, Networking events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Uses modern tracking and analytics tools but lacks privacy compliance disclosures.
  6. Website is built on WordPress with Divi theme, indicating a common CMS platform.
  7. No security headers detected, suggesting room for security improvements.
  8. Content is relevant to an educational data festival event in Czech Republic.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a widely used CMS and framework combination. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates analytics and tracking tools such as Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimizations are present but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern but standard, with opportunities to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but improvements in security headers and policy disclosures are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kpmgdatafestival.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kpmgdatafestival.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.