Skip to main content

Security report for kotisivutehdas.fi

Kotisivutehdas / MediaSPREA · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kotisivutehdas is a Finnish small-sized technology service provider specializing in professional website development, SEO, AI services, and comprehensive marketing solutions. The company targets small and medium enterprises seeking turnkey, responsive, and SEO-optimized websites. Their market position is strengthened by over 20 years of industry experience and a broad service portfolio including copywriting, website maintenance, and security services. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks like UIkit and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. However, the website suffers from critical security shortcomings, notably the absence of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, which severely impacts its security posture. Privacy compliance is addressed through a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and a detailed privacy policy, though terms of service and security policies are lacking. Overall, the website presents professional content and clear contact information but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kotisivutehdas.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kotisivutehdas operates in the Finnish technology sector, focusing on web design and digital marketing services. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end website solutions and marketing support, catering primarily to SMEs. The company leverages partnerships with hosting providers like zone.eu and integrates third-party analytics and advertising platforms. Revenue streams likely include project-based website development, ongoing SEO and AI services, and maintenance contracts. The presence of multiple Facebook Pixels and Google Analytics indicates a data-driven marketing approach. The company maintains a consistent brand image and offers transparent contact details, enhancing credibility. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies beyond MediaSPREA was found. Growth indicators include a diverse service offering and active digital presence.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. The absence of security headers, DNSSEC, CAA, and DMARC records further weakens the security framework. While SPF is correctly configured, the lack of DMARC may allow email spoofing. No incident response or security policy pages were identified, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The cookie consent implementation aligns with GDPR requirements, but extensive use of tracking pixels raises privacy concerns. Immediate remediation is required to implement HTTPS, security headers, and email authentication standards to mitigate risks and comply with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Configure DMARC records to enhance email security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to improve DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  5. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to increase transparency and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes the UIkit framework for responsive design and includes HTML5 video elements, indicating modern front-end practices. Integration with Google Analytics and multiple Facebook Pixels supports advanced marketing analytics and retargeting capabilities. Hosting is managed via zone.eu, as indicated by DNS records and SPF includes. Performance is suboptimal with a load time exceeding 12 seconds and a page size of approximately 1MB, suggesting opportunities for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and structured navigation. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents significant technical debt and risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security enhancements to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kotisivutehdas.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kotisivutehdas.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.