Skip to main content

Security report for kontextai.net

Kontext AI · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kontext AI is a technology company specializing in advanced AI-driven image generation and editing services using their proprietary FLUX Kontext technology. The platform offers free AI tools that enable users to generate photorealistic images from text prompts and perform in-context image editing with high accuracy and speed. Their market position is that of an innovative AI service provider targeting general users interested in creative image manipulation and generation. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site demonstrates excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks several security headers and does not implement DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The WHOIS data raises concerns due to a domain creation date set in the future, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, Kontext AI presents a professional and functional platform with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kontextai.net

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kontext AI operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-powered image generation and editing. Their business model includes offering free AI tools with premium options, targeting a broad audience of creative users and professionals. The company emphasizes advanced AI capabilities such as transformer-based diffusion models and iterative editing workflows, positioning itself as a cutting-edge solution in the AI image generation market. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information limits transparency. The platform's partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, and no subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. Growth indicators include advanced technology claims and a modern web presence. Strategic observations suggest the company should enhance trust signals by clarifying business details and improving compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and secure file upload controls. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The absence of DNSSEC reduces domain-level security. No incident response or security policy information is published, indicating limited transparency and preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism despite using Google Analytics. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  5. Clarify WHOIS registration details and ensure domain registration data is accurate to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kontext AI
Description
Kontext AI offers advanced FLUX Kontext AI technology for professional image generation and editing, enabling users to create, modify, and enhance images with context-aware AI.
Key services
Text-to-image generation, In-context image editing, Iterative editing workflow
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare DNS, Google Analytics, Lucide Icons
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure file upload input with restrictions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear branding and navigation.
  3. Focus on advanced AI image generation and editing technology.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date, lowering domain trust.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  7. No security policy or incident response info published.
  8. Uses Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent.
  9. No DNSSEC enabled on domain.
  10. No security headers detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site uses optimized fonts and icons (Lucide) and has a well-structured HTML with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Performance is fast with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility features such as focus rings and semantic HTML are present. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be improved with enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kontextai.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kontextai.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.