Skip to main content

Security report for kolektor.com

Kolektor · Technology · Slovenia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kolektor is a large, established industrial and technology company based in Slovenia, specializing in manufacturing and technological solutions primarily for the automotive, energy, and construction sectors. The company operates multiple subsidiaries focused on energy transformers, water technologies, automation, and construction. Their website reflects a professional corporate presence with multilingual support and a focus on innovation and sustainability. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Apollo.io, and IpMeta, and enforces HTTPS with reCAPTCHA protections on forms. However, some security best practices like security headers and explicit incident response contacts are missing. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall digital footprint and branding consistency support legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating a mature approach to data protection. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility, with room for improvement in security posture and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kolektor.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kolektor holds a strong market position as a leading player in niche industrial sectors, particularly automotive components and energy solutions. Their diversified business model includes manufacturing, technology development, and infrastructure construction. The company targets industrial clients and partners globally, supported by a network of subsidiaries and partner sites. Their digital presence emphasizes corporate responsibility, innovation, and strategic partnerships. The absence of detailed WHOIS data suggests a need for verification but does not detract significantly from their established market presence. The company leverages modern marketing and analytics tools to engage audiences and track performance, indicating a data-driven approach to business growth.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and improving communication channels for security matters.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Provide explicit company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to improve trust and communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kolektor d.d.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kolektor
Description
Poganjamo vaš vsakdan. Z razvojem tehnološko zahtevnih izdelkov in rešitev smo vodilni v posameznih nišah.
Key services
Automotive components (Komutatorji, Magnetika, Hibridika, Elektronika in pogoni, Izolacija), Energy solutions (Energetski transformatorji, Sistemi v elektroenergetiki), Water technologies, Automation and electroengineering, Construction and infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, jQuery, Apollo.io website tracker, IpMeta plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Apollo.io, IpMeta
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Apollo.io website tracker, IpMeta
Marketing tools
Apollo.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language support.
  2. Strong corporate branding and professional design.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact pages may have more details.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with moderate user tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for an established corporate domain.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, FontAwesome for icons, and third-party tracking services like Apollo.io and IpMeta. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and supports multiple languages. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the CMS or hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional corporate presence but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kolektor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kolektor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.