Skip to main content

Security report for kkx.one

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website kkx.one is a personal landing page created in 2021, serving as a simple link aggregator for the individual or entity known as '33KK'. It primarily links to social media platforms, code repositories, and streaming services, targeting a general audience interested in the owner's online presence. The business model is minimal and personal, with no commercial or transactional features. The domain is privacy protected by 'Private by Design, LLC', a US-based privacy service, which aligns with the personal and privacy-conscious nature of the site. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, and shows good performance and mobile optimization. However, it lacks advanced frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools. The site does not implement DNSSEC, security headers, or privacy and cookie policies, which limits its compliance and security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. From a security perspective, the domain is protected against unauthorized transfer and deletion, and uses Cloudflare nameservers, which is positive. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and privacy policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. The site does not collect user data or track visitors, which reduces privacy risks but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the website is low risk, with a basic security posture suitable for a personal site. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and considering a vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kkx.one

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small personal brand or individual presence in the technology sector, focusing on social and code community engagement. It does not appear to generate revenue or operate commercially. The use of privacy protection services and Cloudflare DNS suggests a preference for privacy and security. The target audience is likely peers or followers in the tech and streaming communities. The business model is simple link aggregation without e-commerce or advertising. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators and market positioning are minimal due to the personal nature of the site.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The domain uses privacy protection and Cloudflare DNS, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts indicates limited security governance. No forms or data collection reduce exposure to common web vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated. Overall, the site is low risk but could benefit from adopting standard security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
My small website with links to stuff
Key services
link aggregation to social media and code repositories
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited set
  • Use of Cloudflare nameservers

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal personal landing page with links to social and code repositories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and domain status flags.
  7. Website uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No business certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML/CSS site with no detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. It uses Cloudflare DNS but does not enable DNSSEC. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly. There are no analytics or tracking scripts, which limits data collection but improves privacy. The absence of security headers and policies indicates technical debt in security implementation. The domain registration is privacy protected, consistent with the personal nature of the site. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and functional but could be modernized with security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kkx.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kkx.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.