Skip to main content

Security report for kita-hanau.de

kita-hanau · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

kita-hanau.de is a German website providing childcare and early education services in the city of Hanau. The site targets parents and families seeking childcare options, offering information about their models and facilities. The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and integrates Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The technical infrastructure is modern with standard libraries such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though additional security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy could enhance trust. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving a local educational sector niche effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kita-hanau.de

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education sector, specifically early childhood care, focusing on the Hanau region. Its business model revolves around providing childcare services, including U3 care (under 3 years old). The website content and metadata indicate a small-sized local provider with consistent branding and clear service descriptions. The absence of detailed contact information or certifications suggests a modest scale operation. The use of Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager reflects awareness of privacy and analytics needs. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company maintains a straightforward online presence aimed at informing and engaging local families.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and plugins, but ongoing maintenance is recommended to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a small educational website but could benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Ensure all WordPress components and plugins are regularly updated to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding visible contact information and certifications to enhance business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
kita-hanau
Description
Schön, dass Sie auf unserer neuen Kita-Seite sind. Lernen Sie hier unsere Modelle und Einrichtungen zur Kinderbetreuung kennen. Auch möchten wir Ihnen unsere Werte und Perspektiven in der wachsenden Stadt Hanau vorstellen. Von der U3-Betreuung bis zum
Key services
Kinderbetreuung, U3-Betreuung, Kinderbetreuungseinrichtungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Cookiebot, WordPress, Avada Theme, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme.
  2. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management with detailed cookie categories.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Website is in German and targets local audience in Hanau, Germany.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information found.
  8. Website content is relevant and professional for childcare services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.4 with the Avada theme, leveraging jQuery and Cookiebot scripts for functionality and compliance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by external scripts and cookie consent mechanisms. The site uses standard meta tags and Open Graph tags for SEO and social sharing. Hosting provider details are not explicit. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kita-hanau.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kita-hanau.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.