Skip to main content

Security report for kinet.cz

KINET - Váš IT partner · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KINET is a Czech Republic-based IT services company specializing in comprehensive IT infrastructure solutions, outsourcing, cloud services, hardware and software supply, and network security primarily targeting firms, schools, and municipalities. The company positions itself as a trusted IT partner with a strong portfolio of services including virtual servers, cloud storage, email services, and specialized educational technology solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and GDPR-compliant policies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and includes security features like HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust but does not detract significantly from the overall professional appearance and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kinet.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KINET operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT services and education-related technology solutions. Their business model revolves around providing managed IT services, cloud solutions, and custom software development, supported by partnerships with major technology vendors such as Microsoft, Dell, and ESET. The company serves a diverse client base including small to medium enterprises, schools, and public institutions, indicating a stable and diversified revenue stream. Their visible certifications and partner logos enhance market credibility. The website content and structure suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a well-established market presence in the Czech Republic. Growth indicators include active news updates and a broad partner ecosystem. The company emphasizes GDPR compliance and customer support, which are critical in their sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented in compliance with GDPR. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact details on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KINET - Váš IT partner
Description
Komplexní IT služby pro firmy a školy – outsourcing, cloud, dodávky zboží. Zajistíme bezpečný a stabilní provoz vaší IT infrastruktury.
Key services
IT infrastructure analysis and design, IT outsourcing and management, Virtual server rental, Cloud storage, Hardware and software supply and servicing, Network security, Email services (Kerio Connect), HbbTV application development, Accessible school solutions, Smart classroom solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery, slick slider
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Strong presence of GDPR compliance and cookie consent.
  4. Multiple social media and partner links indicate active business relationships.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  6. Contact information is complete and includes phone, email, address, and contact form.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  9. No detected WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a standard but effective technology stack for content management and SEO optimization. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection on forms. The site uses jQuery and slick slider for UI components. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site includes comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks are minimal but include the absence of advanced security headers and potential technical debt from plugin dependencies. Opportunities exist to modernize front-end frameworks and improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kinet.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kinet.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.