Skip to main content

Security report for kedgebs-alumni.com

KEDGE Alumni · Education · France

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KEDGE Alumni operates as a large, well-established alumni network for KEDGE Business School graduates, providing career services, networking events, and professional development resources. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Security measures such as HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and hCaptcha are implemented, enhancing the site's security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting a mature approach to data protection. However, the absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be further investigated. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional platform for alumni engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kedgebs-alumni.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets alumni and graduates of KEDGE Business School, offering services like job boards, coaching, and event participation. It maintains a strong social media presence and global chapters, indicating a broad and active community. The business model focuses on community building and career support, leveraging digital tools for engagement. Partnerships with the parent school and donation platforms enhance credibility. The lack of visible company registration or contact emails is a minor gap but does not detract significantly from the business's apparent legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates good security hygiene with HTTPS, secure login forms, and anti-spam measures like hCaptcha. Cookie consent mechanisms and CSRF tokens are present, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of advanced security headers and a published security policy or incident response plan indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The security score is strong but could be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to prevent vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KEDGE Alumni
Description
KEDGE Alumni est le réseau des 80 000 diplômés des formations de KEDGE Business School, dont 20 000 vivent hors de France.
Key services
Job board, Career coaching, Workshops and events, Networking groups, KEDGE Library access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, SweetAlert, intl-tel-input, Leaflet.js, hCaptcha, LABjs, TinyMCE, Select2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • hCaptcha for spam prevention
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Secure login with password toggle

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Smart App Banner, Tarteaucitron cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. Strong alumni network presence with global chapters and active events.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and security practices.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Leaflet.js for maps. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site integrates multiple JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and analytics. Hosting provider details are not evident. The technical infrastructure supports a rich user experience but could benefit from performance tuning and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kedgebs-alumni.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kedgebs-alumni.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.