Skip to main content

Security report for kdarbnica.lv

SIA KOMUNIKĀCIJU DARBNĪCA · Education · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA KOMUNIKĀCIJU DARBNĪCA is a Latvian company specializing in professional seminars and training focused on leadership, sales, customer service, and other business development areas. Established in 2004, it serves business professionals and organizations seeking to enhance their management and sales capabilities. The website presents a professional image with clear navigation and relevant content, targeting a Latvian-speaking audience primarily. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Visual Composer, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. While the site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, it uses an outdated jQuery version and lacks modern security headers, which could expose it to vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced security measures and privacy compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kdarbnica.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the education and consulting sector, offering a range of seminars and training programs tailored to leadership, sales, and customer service. Its business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagements and workshops. The presence of client testimonials and logos from reputable companies suggests a solid market position within Latvia. The company targets business professionals and organizations, leveraging a localized approach with Latvian language content. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital presence and enhancing compliance with data protection regulations. Partnerships appear limited to local service providers, with no evident subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure contact forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4) is a notable vulnerability that should be addressed promptly. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the company to regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other plugins to the latest secure versions.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA KOMUNIKĀCIJU DARBNĪCA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA KOMUNIKĀCIJU DARBNĪCA
Description
SIA KOMUNIKĀCIJU DARBNĪCA provides seminars and training focused on leadership, sales, customer service, and other professional development topics. They offer a variety of workshops and consulting services aimed at improving management skills, sales techniques, and client relations.
Key services
Leadership and management seminars, Sales training, Customer service training, Consultations and evaluations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Visual Composer (js_composer), Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  4. Website uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  5. No security headers detected which could improve security posture.
  6. Business appears to be a small Latvian training and consulting company established in 2004.
  7. Good quality content and professional design with clear navigation.
  8. Google Analytics is used for tracking but no cookie consent mechanism is present.
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; domain registration details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Visual Composer, and uses jQuery 1.12.4. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads with moderate speed and is mobile-optimized, providing a good user experience. However, the outdated jQuery version poses a security risk, and the absence of security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business but would benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kdarbnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kdarbnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.