Skip to main content

Security report for kaspersky.fi

AO Kaspersky Lab · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AO Kaspersky Lab is a globally recognized cybersecurity company founded in 1997, specializing in advanced cyber protection solutions for both home users and businesses. The company holds a strong market position as a leader in cybersecurity, offering a wide range of products including antivirus software, VPN services, password management, and enterprise security solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, customer testimonials, and multiple independent certifications, reinforcing their credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good accessibility. The use of advanced analytics and A/B testing tools like Kameleoon and Google Tag Manager indicates a data-driven approach to user experience and marketing. Security best practices are well implemented, including HTTPS enforcement and security headers, contributing to a strong security posture. While the site lacks explicit incident response contact details and a security.txt file, it maintains GDPR compliance with clear privacy and cookie policies. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the domain registration details align well with the company's identity, supporting high legitimacy. Overall, AO Kaspersky Lab's website demonstrates a professional, secure, and user-friendly platform that effectively supports its business objectives and maintains strong trust signals.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of kaspersky.fi. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kaspersky.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kaspersky operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity products and services. Its business model revolves around software sales and subscription-based services targeting both individual consumers and enterprises. The company leverages a global partnership ecosystem, including payment processors like Nexway, to facilitate transactions. Market positioning is strong, supported by numerous awards and independent certifications. The company targets a broad audience from home users to large organizations, emphasizing product reliability, performance, and privacy. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, extensive regional websites, and active social media engagement. Strategic observations highlight Kaspersky's commitment to transparency, independence, and comprehensive cyber threat protection.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. Forms appear secure with no visible issues. However, the absence of explicit incident response contacts and a security.txt file suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management transparency. GDPR compliance is evident, but more detailed data retention policies could enhance trust. Overall, the security culture appears strong, supported by independent audits and certifications, but could benefit from enhanced communication on security processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and abuse contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Enhance privacy disclosures with detailed data retention and processing policies.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential security risks.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AO Kaspersky Lab
Description
Seuraavan sukupolven kybersuojausratkaisujen ja - palvelujen maailmanlaajuinen johtaja Kaspersky tarjoaa koti- ja yrityskäyttöön ensiluokkaisen suojauksen kaikilta kyberuhilta.
Key services
Antivirus and malware protection, VPN services, Password management, Parental control, Enterprise cybersecurity solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Kameleoon (A/B testing), Google Tag Manager, Custom analytics scripts
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Windows, macOS, Android, iOS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Kameleoon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Kameleoon
Marketing tools
Kameleoon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted to both home users and businesses.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including awards and certifications.
  4. Good technical implementation with modern frameworks and security best practices.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  7. Social media presence is strong and consistent with brand.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast page loads. It integrates advanced analytics and A/B testing tools such as Kameleoon and Google Tag Manager, indicating a sophisticated approach to user experience optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is fast with proper use of preloading and caching strategies. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary content management solution. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the site uses secure HTTPS connections and modern security headers. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is advised to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kaspersky.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kaspersky.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.