Skip to main content

Security report for kappadata.pl

Kappa Data · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kappa Data is a value-added distributor (VAD) specializing in networking, security, and IoT solutions primarily serving the Polish market. The company offers technical and sales support, ongoing training, and consulting services, partnering with reputable manufacturers to deliver innovative IT solutions to businesses and institutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with multilingual support and a focus on IT infrastructure and cybersecurity expertise. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations such as lazy loading and asynchronous script loading. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable from the Polish registry, which slightly impacts trust but the website content and structure support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-positioned in its market segment with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kappadata.pl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kappa Data operates as an important entity in the technology sector, focusing on value-added distribution of networking and cybersecurity products. Its business model revolves around providing comprehensive support and training to partners and customers, enhancing product adoption and customer satisfaction. The company targets IT professionals, businesses, and institutions requiring advanced IT infrastructure and security solutions. The presence of regional partner sites in the Netherlands, Belgium, and France indicates a broader European footprint. The company appears medium-sized, founded around 2020, with a clear focus on growth through partnerships and expertise. The website content and structure suggest a mature digital presence with good SEO and user experience, supporting its market positioning.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies with performance optimizations, indicating a baseline of security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which may expose the company to compliance risks, especially under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency for security issues. The lack of WHOIS data from the registry is a concern but may be due to registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear opportunities for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing WHOIS data or domain registration information if possible to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kappa Data
Description
Kappa Data Polska – dystrybutor z wartością dodaną (VAD) specjalizujący się w rozwiązaniach sieciowych i cyberbezpieczeństwie. Oferujemy wsparcie techniczne, handlowe, stałe szkolenia oraz doradztwo w zakresie zaawansowanych technologii IT. Współpracujemy z renomowanymi producentami, dostarczając innowacyjne rozwiązania dla firm i instytucji.
Key services
Technical support, Sales support, Training and education, Consulting on advanced IT technologies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WP Rocket, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, RevSlider, Ninja Forms, Ajax Search Lite, Hyphenator.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with async loading
  • Lazy loading of scripts and images

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No WHOIS data available from the Polish registry, which is unusual and may warrant further investigation.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Website is multilingual with Polish and English versions.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a variety of plugins including WP Rocket for caching and performance, RevSlider for visual content, Ninja Forms for form handling, and Ajax Search Lite for search functionality. It uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, along with Microsoft Clarity for user behavior insights. The site employs lazy loading for scripts and images to improve load times and mobile responsiveness. The design is professional with consistent branding and multilingual support. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate with room for optimization in accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kappadata.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kappadata.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.