Skip to main content

Security report for kanso.ee

Kanso · Technology · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kanso.ee is a small Estonian business specializing in custom web development, UX, and UI design services. The website presents a clear but minimalistic business description focused on tailored web solutions and consultation. The company appears to be established since 2016, with a consistent domain registration and hosting provider. The technical infrastructure is basic, relying on jQuery 3.1.1 and Google Fonts, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are present but minimal. Security posture is moderate but lacks critical elements such as security headers and visible HTTPS confirmation. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kanso.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, targeting clients needing custom web development and UX/UI design. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on bespoke digital solutions. The market position is niche, with no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and consultations. The absence of detailed contact information and policies suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital maturity. Growth potential exists with improvements in online presence and compliance. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The website lacks security headers and does not provide evidence of HTTPS enforcement, which is critical for protecting user data. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the use of an older jQuery version could pose risks if not properly maintained. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify its configuration.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kanso
Description
Fully custom websites and applications tailored specifically to enhance your business, project or idea. Web Development and Consultation.
Key services
Web Development, Consultation, Custom Websites, Applications, UX & UI Design
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.1.1
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business site offering custom web development and UX/UI design.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email address.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses provided.
  5. Minimal technical sophistication; uses jQuery 3.1.1 and Google Fonts.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security measures visible.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports legitimacy.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack with jQuery 3.1.1 and Google Fonts. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, consistent with the WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no analytics or tracking tools are present. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, especially in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kanso.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kanso.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.