Skip to main content

Security report for kameleoon.com

Kameleoon · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kameleoon is a leading SaaS provider specializing in A/B testing, feature experimentation, and AI-driven personalization solutions. Their platform unifies marketing, product, and engineering teams to optimize user engagement and conversion rates. Recognized as a strong performer by Forrester Wave™, Kameleoon serves enterprise clients across various industries with a focus on data accuracy, privacy, and security. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, professional design, and extensive integrations with analytics and marketing tools. Technically, the site leverages Drupal CMS and modern JavaScript libraries, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong, with HTTPS enforcement, ISO 27001 and SOC2 certifications, and robust security headers. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data and lack of explicit contact information slightly reduce trust scores. Overall, Kameleoon presents a credible and professional online presence aligned with enterprise standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kameleoon.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kameleoon operates in the technology sector, targeting marketers, product managers, developers, and experimentation leaders. Their business model revolves around providing a unified experimentation and personalization platform powered by AI. The company has established a strong market position, evidenced by industry recognition and a portfolio of high-profile clients such as Toyota and Longines. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing their service offering. The platform supports multiple industries including e-commerce, automotive, financial services, and healthcare. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation, AI capabilities, and a comprehensive resource and training academy. Strategic observations highlight the company's focus on data privacy, security compliance, and enabling cross-team collaboration.

Security posture

Kameleoon demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to industry standards such as ISO 27001 and SOC2. The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers like CSP and HSTS. Data privacy compliance is evident with GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA considerations integrated into their platform. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a gap in transparency. The platform's security culture appears robust but could benefit from enhanced communication channels for security incidents and disclosures. Overall, the security maturity aligns well with enterprise expectations, minimizing business risk.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance visibility of company contact details to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Maintain up-to-date WHOIS information to avoid trust concerns and ensure domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kameleoon
Description
Kameleoon provides a unified platform for web experimentation, personalization, and feature management, enabling marketing, product, and engineering teams to optimize engagement and conversion using AI.
Key services
Web Experimentation, Feature Experimentation, AI Copilot, Mobile App Testing, Personalization, Product Recommendation, Data Accuracy, Privacy & Security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO, HubSpot, ZoomInfo, JavaScript, TypeScript
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of CSP and other security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure third-party integrations

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Mixpanel, ZoomInfo, HubSpot, Piwik PRO, Facebook Ads Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong emphasis on AI-driven experimentation and personalization
  3. Multiple integrations with marketing and analytics platforms
  4. Security certifications and compliance prominently displayed
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main site
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for enterprise domain
  7. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries and integrations including Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, HubSpot, and Piwik PRO for analytics and marketing automation. The site is well-optimized for performance with asynchronous script loading and preconnect hints. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented. The technical infrastructure supports real-time data processing and AI-driven experimentation capabilities. No significant technical debt or outdated components were identified. Opportunities exist to improve domain registration transparency and enhance security incident communication. Overall, the technical foundation is solid and supports the company's business objectives effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kameleoon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kameleoon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.