Skip to main content

Security report for kaleidoscope.at

Kaleidoscope GmbH · Technology · Austria

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kaleidoscope GmbH is a medium-sized technology company specializing in terminology management, quality management, translation, and documentation services. They provide a comprehensive suite of software and consulting services aimed at enabling businesses to communicate content globally in a consistent and efficient manner. Their market position is supported by long-standing client relationships and partnerships with technology providers such as Eurocom, Congram, and Greatcontent. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and optimized for SEO, targeting companies seeking global content solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a significant security concern. The security posture is basic with several missing best practices, including HTTPS and TLS support. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policies in place. Overall, the site is trustworthy but requires urgent security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kaleidoscope.at

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
0
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kaleidoscope operates in the technology sector, focusing on content management and translation solutions for industries such as manufacturing and software. Their business model combines consulting, software sales, and support services. The company targets enterprises aiming for international market success through efficient content workflows. Their partnership ecosystem includes Eurocom, Congram, and Greatcontent, enhancing their service offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with good SEO and user experience but lacks advanced performance optimization. Growth indicators include active content marketing via blogs, webinars, and events. The company emphasizes innovation and continuous improvement in terminology and automation management.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS protocol support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient without HTTPS. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is adequate with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The lack of secure forms and session management further weakens the security posture. Immediate remediation is required to install SSL/TLS, enable secure protocols, and enhance security policies to protect business and user data effectively.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols and disable all insecure protocols to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement and enforce HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags to prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  4. Develop and publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers, including Content-Security-Policy, to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and several plugins such as Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg and Borlabs Cookie for consent management. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and HubSpot Analytics. The site is hosted on infrastructure associated with a1.net DNS servers. Performance metrics indicate slow loading times, possibly due to lack of caching or optimization. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a critical technical risk. The site uses multiple external scripts and resources, which are managed with cookie consent mechanisms. Technical debt includes missing SSL, lack of session resumption, and no OCSP stapling, which should be addressed to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kaleidoscope.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kaleidoscope.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.