Skip to main content

Security report for kadanka.net

Marián Kadaňka · Technology · Slovakia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kadanka.net is a small Slovakian web design and development business operated by Marián Kadaňka, specializing in custom WordPress and WooCommerce solutions along with IT systems management. The website serves as a professional portfolio and contact point, targeting businesses and individuals seeking tailored web services. The site demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a clean, responsive design and basic SEO optimization, but lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS detection. Security posture is moderate; while domain registration is consistent and secure with transfer prohibitions, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kadanka.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on web design and WordPress-based e-commerce solutions. It appears to be a sole proprietorship or small business founded in 2019, with no parent or subsidiary companies. The business model is service-oriented, providing custom development and IT management. The presence of GitHub and WordPress profiles suggests active engagement with developer communities, enhancing credibility. Market positioning is niche and localized, targeting Slovakian clients. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts. No advertising or tracking tools are used, indicating a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing scale. The company maintains transparent contact details but lacks formalized policies or certifications.

Security posture

The website's security posture is moderate. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and includes transfer and update prohibitions, which protect against unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts reduces exposure to data leakage risks. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  4. Consider deploying a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update website technologies and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Marián Kadaňka
Description
Web design, WooCommerce e-shop, WordPress plugins, custom WordPress solutions, IT systems management
Key services
Web design, WooCommerce e-shop development, Custom WordPress solutions, IT systems management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, WOFF2 fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business portfolio site for a web designer and developer.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected on the homepage.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers detected from provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  7. Website uses custom fonts and responsive design for mobile.
  8. External links limited to professional profiles on GitHub and WordPress.org.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS3 technologies, utilizing custom web fonts in WOFF2 format for performance and aesthetics. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a clean and consistent visual style. Hosting appears to be provided by Forpsi, inferred from the nameservers. No JavaScript frameworks or CMS detection was possible from the provided data, though the business focus suggests WordPress usage. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or tracking. SEO is basic with meta description and viewport tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic with semantic HTML but no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business portfolio site but could be enhanced with modern frameworks and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kadanka.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kadanka.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.