Rīgas Juglas Mūzikas skola is a Latvian music school focused on providing music education to children and youth. The school offers various music programs including string, keyboard, wind, and percussion instruments, and organizes competitions and festivals to engage students. The website is designed to serve the local community with relevant educational content and information about the school’s activities. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging AWS Cloudfront for content delivery and using common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance, though some improvements are recommended. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image consistent with an educational institution.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention juglasmuzikasskola.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for juglasmuzikasskola.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The school operates as a small educational entity within the Latvian music education sector, targeting children and youth interested in learning music. Its business model is centered on providing structured music education programs and organizing related cultural events. The website supports this by offering detailed program descriptions and event information. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some level of community engagement. There is no evidence of commercial transactions or monetization on the site. The lack of detailed contact information and absence of terms of service or security policies suggest areas for operational improvement. The school appears to maintain a focused and localized market position without broader commercial ambitions.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS, which is essential for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There are no visible forms on the homepage, reducing the attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. Privacy and cookie policies are present, but the absence of an explicit cookie consent mechanism may be a compliance gap under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder security incident handling. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices.
Recommendations
Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain a secure environment.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Rīgas Juglas Mūzikas skola
Description
Rīgas Juglas Mūzikas skola is a music school providing music education programs including string instruments, keyboard instruments, wind and percussion instruments, and interest education. The school organizes competitions, festivals, and has various collectives and an album of pictures. It targets children and youth interested in music education.
Key services
Music education, Competitions and festivals, Interest education, Collectives and ensembles
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is in Latvian language targeting local community.
No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the homepage.
Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
No visible forms for data collection on the homepage.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
No terms of service page detected.
Website uses Mozello CMS and AWS Cloudfront CDN.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on Mozello CMS, utilizing AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good availability and performance. The technology stack includes jQuery 2.2.4 and Fancybox 3 for UI components, which are somewhat dated but functional. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and includes responsive video support. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and meta viewport settings. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and skip links, but could be improved. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site’s performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by updating libraries and optimizing assets.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with juglasmuzikasskola.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juglasmuzikasskola.lv.