Skip to main content

Security report for jttkonsultacijusistema.lv

Education · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jttkonsultacijusistema.lv serves as an online consultation scheduling system for Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikums, a Latvian educational institution. It facilitates students and teachers in managing consultation appointments efficiently, providing features such as viewing available times, subjects, and room information. The platform targets primarily students and pedagogues within the institution, aiming to reduce administrative overhead and improve scheduling clarity. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React and Microsoft Authentication Library (MSAL), indicating a contemporary frontend infrastructure. The use of ES modules and Vite as a build tool further supports a modern development approach. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good design and user experience, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS as implied by the Open Graph URL, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance given its EU location. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting transparency and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is functional and well-designed for its niche educational purpose but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance measures, and clearer contact information to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jttkonsultacijusistema.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jttkonsultacijusistema.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jttkonsultacijusistema.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates as a specialized internal tool for an educational institution, focusing on streamlining consultation scheduling between students and teachers. Its market position is niche and localized within Latvia, serving a small user base. The business model is service-oriented, providing a digital solution to reduce physical administrative tasks and improve communication efficiency. There is no indication of revenue streams beyond institutional use. The absence of broader business information or partnerships suggests a focused operational scope. The technology stack and design quality indicate a commitment to modern digital standards, supporting potential future scalability or feature expansion.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The lack of incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the ability to manage security incidents effectively. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found, which is positive. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, formal privacy documentation, and incident response processes to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including incident response and security contacts.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Jēkabpils Tehnoloģiju tehnikuma konsultāciju sistēma - ātri un ērti piesakies uz konsultācijām pie pedagogiem. Redzami pieejamie laiki, priekšmeti un telpu informācija.
Key services
Consultation scheduling, Teacher availability display, Appointment management for teachers, Notifications and reminders
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, MSAL (Microsoft Authentication Library), vite (build tool), JavaScript ES Modules
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by og:url
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an internal consultation scheduling system for an educational institution in Latvia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Modern frontend stack using React and MSAL for authentication.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected in HTML.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with a natural person registrant in Latvia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern frontend stack with React and MSAL for authentication, indicating integration with Microsoft identity services. The use of Vite as a build tool suggests efficient development and bundling processes. The site is mobile-optimized and uses semantic HTML with meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). However, no CMS or backend platform details are evident. Performance appears moderate based on asset loading patterns. There is no evidence of third-party analytics or advertising scripts, which reduces tracking but also limits marketing insights. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved with enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jttkonsultacijusistema.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jttkonsultacijusistema.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.