Skip to main content

Security report for jsmenadani.cz

JCMM, z. s. p. o. · Education · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

58/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jsme nadaní is a Czech Republic based non-profit project operated by JCMM, z. s. p. o., focused on supporting gifted children through identification, counseling, educational activities, and development programs. The website serves parents, schools, and students with resources such as testing, lectures, support groups, and clubs. The project is well integrated with related JCMM services and partner sites, establishing a credible position in the regional educational support sector. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap, and a Nette-based backend, hosted by Wedos. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with GDPR-related pages linked. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though improvements in security policies and contact transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jsmenadani.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The project operates as an important entity within the education and non-profit sectors, targeting a niche audience of gifted children and their support networks. Its business model revolves around educational support and development rather than commercial revenue. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's timeline, reinforcing legitimacy. The site leverages partnerships with related educational platforms to broaden its reach. Testimonials and social media presence enhance trust and community engagement. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main page suggests a controlled communication approach, likely via forms or dedicated contact pages. The project benefits from affiliation with JCMM, a recognized organization in the region.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. The login form includes client-side validation but lacks visible advanced security features such as multi-factor authentication or explicit security headers. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which could improve incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Improve SEO metadata with descriptive content and Open Graph tags for better social sharing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JCMM, z. s. p. o.
Description
Jsme nadaní is a project focused on supporting gifted children through testing, counseling, educational activities, and development programs. It targets parents, schools, and students to help identify and nurture giftedness.
Key services
Testing for giftedness, Counseling for parents and schools, Educational lectures and conferences, Development groups and clubs for students, Databases of educational tasks, Support programs and scholarships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL https://jsmenadani.cz/)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Login form with required fields and validation rules

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on supporting gifted children and related stakeholders.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond GDPR cookie and privacy notices found.
  4. Login form present with basic validation but no multi-factor authentication visible.
  5. Social media presence on major platforms supports trust and outreach.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
  7. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content; contact likely via forms or separate contact page.
  8. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  9. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  10. Technical stack includes modern JS libraries and frameworks with moderate performance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Slick Carousel for sliders, Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and likely the Nette PHP framework for backend operations. The site is hosted by Wedos, a reputable Czech hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. The site uses standard fonts loaded from Google Fonts. The HTML is well structured with semantic elements and includes client-side validation for forms. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO metadata completeness. No CMS like WordPress or Joomla is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based CMS solution.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jsmenadani.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jsmenadani.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.