Skip to main content

Security report for jscrambler.com

Jscrambler · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jscrambler is a technology company specializing in client-side protection platforms, offering advanced JavaScript obfuscation and third-party tag protection solutions. Established in 2010, it serves enterprises and businesses seeking to secure their web applications and comply with regulations such as PCI DSS. The company positions itself as a leader in client-side security with a comprehensive suite of services tailored to various industries including finance, e-commerce, and healthcare. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed product information and resources to support customer engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, HubSpot for marketing and analytics, and Cloudflare for DNS and security. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, but lacks visible advanced security headers and explicit security policies on the site. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust. The domain WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, Jscrambler presents a secure and professional online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance transparency and security policy disclosures. The risk profile is low, with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jscrambler.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
50
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jscrambler.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
855
Employees
0
Customers
855
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jscrambler.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jscrambler operates in the niche market of client-side security, focusing on JavaScript obfuscation and compliance facilitation. Its business model is B2B SaaS, targeting enterprises requiring protection against client-side threats and regulatory compliance. The company has established partnerships and alliance programs, indicating a strong ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and enterprise licensing. The website content and structure suggest a focus on mid to large-sized organizations across technology, finance, and e-commerce sectors. Growth indicators include extensive resource offerings, case studies, and active marketing efforts. The company maintains a consistent brand and professional content, reinforcing its market position as a trusted provider.

Security posture

The security posture of Jscrambler's website is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientTransferProhibited status. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers like Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security are areas for enhancement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact transparency and trust. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces potential privacy considerations. Overall, the site demonstrates good security hygiene but would benefit from formalizing and publishing security policies and improving technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and security policies including GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  5. Provide explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jscrambler
Description
Jscrambler offers an exclusive blend of cutting-edge first-party JavaScript obfuscation and state-of-the-art third-party tag protection.
Key services
JavaScript obfuscation, Third-party tag protection, PCI DSS compliance facilitation, Client-side protection platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HubSpot analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, G2 Crowd
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads Pixel, Reddit Ads Pixel
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, G2 Crowd Attribution
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intercom, Apollo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and focused on client-side security solutions.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in provided content.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools indicates extensive user tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies and integrates HubSpot for marketing automation and analytics. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate due to multiple third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No CMS other than HubSpot is detected. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 86/100Low16 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jscrambler.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jscrambler.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.