Skip to main content

Security report for jpgs-schwarzenbach.de

Jean-Paul-Grundschule · Education · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jean-Paul-Grundschule is a local primary school based in Schwarzenbach an der Saale, Germany, serving students, parents, and the community with educational services and school-related information. The website provides clear contact details, school news, and links to relevant educational partners and government bodies. The site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, indicating a standard but modern technical infrastructure suitable for a small educational institution. The website is mobile-optimized and presents a consistent brand image with official logos and structured navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy PDF available but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though improvements in privacy and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jpgs-schwarzenbach.de

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates as a public educational institution focused on primary education within its local community. Its market position is that of a small, essential service provider in the education sector. The business model is non-commercial, funded by public means, and targets parents, students, and local stakeholders. The website supports community engagement and provides resources such as schedules, staff information, and extracurricular activities. Partnerships with regional educational and governmental organizations are evident through external links. The absence of commercial advertising or analytics suggests a focus on privacy and community service rather than monetization. Growth indicators are not applicable given the public school nature, but the site maintains a stable digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy is published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. No forms or user input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which minimizes privacy risks. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers, cookie consent implementation, and published security policies to improve compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding accessibility improvements and SEO enhancements to improve user experience and discoverability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jean-Paul-Grundschule
Description
A primary school located in Schwarzenbach an der Saale, Germany, providing education and school-related information to students, parents, and the community.
Key services
Primary education, School information and updates, Extracurricular activities, Parental and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based official primary school site in Germany.
  2. Content is in German and targeted at local community stakeholders.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No advertising or affiliate marketing present.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security warnings.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage; no user data collection observed.
  10. WHOIS data is limited but domain appears stable and appropriate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.8.3 with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, indicating a common and supported technology stack. The site loads CSS and JS resources from its own domain and Google Fonts CDN. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive header image sizes. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text present. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Hosting appears to be provided by DomainWings based on nameservers. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, reducing external dependencies and privacy concerns. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small educational website but could be enhanced with modern SEO and accessibility best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jpgs-schwarzenbach.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jpgs-schwarzenbach.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.