Skip to main content

Security report for jpegmini.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JPEGmini.com is a mature technology company specializing in JPEG compression and image size reduction tools. The website positions itself as a leading provider in this niche, targeting photographers, designers, and web developers who require efficient image optimization without quality loss. The business model appears to be SaaS and product sales, supported by a well-structured website with professional design and consistent branding. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Framer and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Plausible Analytics. Hosting is likely on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The domain is well aged and registered with GoDaddy, showing legitimacy and stable ownership. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jpegmini.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jpegmini.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
761
Employees
0
Customers
758
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
29%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jpegmini.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on image compression software. It holds a strong market position as a leading JPEG compressor, serving a specialized audience. The business benefits from a mature domain and a clear digital presence, supported by integrated marketing and analytics platforms. Payment processing is handled via a partner domain on FastSpring, indicating a structured e-commerce setup. The absence of explicit contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company likely generates revenue through software sales and subscriptions, targeting professionals and general users needing image optimization. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing and customer support tools, enhancing operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found, indicating limited transparency in security practices. The use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing is balanced with potential privacy concerns due to moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and improving compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident contacts.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Reduce your image size without compromising on quality. Experience the best JPEG and image compression tool online.
Key services
JPEG compression, image size reduction, online image compression tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, MailerLite, GrooveHQ, FastSpring, Plausible Analytics, Termly Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security-related meta tags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
MailerLite, GrooveHQ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern marketing and analytics tools.
  2. No explicit contact information or privacy policy found on main page.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Termly.
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Domain is well aged and registered with reputable registrar.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to image compression.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, supported by FastSpring for e-commerce. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses Google Tag Manager for flexible analytics deployment and includes tracking pixels from Facebook and Hotjar for user behavior insights. Cookie consent is managed via Termly, indicating attention to privacy regulations. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited accessibility features suggest opportunities for technical improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jpegmini.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jpegmini.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.