Skip to main content

Security report for jito.wtf

Jito Labs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jito Labs is a specialized technology company focused on providing MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) and infrastructure solutions for the Solana blockchain. Their offerings include high-performance systems designed to maximize validator rewards and enhance network security. The website positions Jito Labs as a leading infrastructure provider trusted by major Solana validators, targeting validators, searchers, and stakers within the blockchain ecosystem. The business model revolves around blockchain infrastructure services, leveraging advanced software components such as the Jito-Solana Client and Jito Block Engine. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with optimized fonts and SVG graphics for a professional appearance. The site includes tracking scripts from Klaviyo, indicating marketing and analytics capabilities. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formalized privacy or cookie policies in the provided content. No contact or incident response information is present, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for technology companies but limits domain trust verification. No suspicious or malicious indicators were detected. Overall, the website is professional and credible within its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparent contact information to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jito.wtf

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jito Labs operates in the blockchain technology sector, specifically focusing on Solana MEV infrastructure. Their market positioning as a leading MEV infrastructure provider suggests a competitive advantage in validator reward maximization and blockchain performance optimization. The business model likely includes software licensing, validator services, and partnerships with blockchain stakeholders. The target customers are blockchain validators, searchers, and stakers, indicating a B2B focus within the crypto ecosystem. The presence of a blog and explorer links suggests content marketing and ecosystem engagement strategies. The company appears medium-sized with consistent branding and a clear value proposition. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and incident response mechanisms to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jito Labs
Description
Jito Labs is a leading MEV and infrastructure provider on Solana. We build high-performance systems to maximize validator rewards and secure the network. Explore our solutions for validators, searchers, and stakers.
Key services
Jito-Solana Client, Jito Block Engine, Jito Relayer, Jito Bundles, ShredStream
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, SVG, Web Fonts (Aeonik), Klaviyo (tracking scripts)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Klaviyo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or malformed request
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and includes tracking scripts from Klaviyo
  6. Content is focused on Solana blockchain MEV infrastructure solutions
  7. No explicit or adult content detected
  8. Security headers and policies are not visible in the provided data
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet
  10. External links primarily point to related Solana explorer and Klaviyo domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging web fonts and SVG for visual quality. It uses Klaviyo scripts for marketing analytics, indicating integration with customer engagement tools. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified. The technical stack is appropriate for a technology infrastructure provider but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jito.wtf. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jito.wtf.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.