Skip to main content

Security report for jikt.im

jiktim · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

jiktim is a small, international group of developers focused on creating software, utilities, and apps with a hacker culture identity. Their website is built using Jekyll and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, reflecting a lightweight static site approach. The site content is minimal but consistent with their niche audience of developers and technology enthusiasts. Social media presence is leveraged for community engagement, with multiple Twitter and GitHub profiles linked. Security posture is basic, with no evident security headers or policies, and privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The domain registration aligns with the claimed founding year and shows no suspicious patterns, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but lacks professional polish and comprehensive compliance or security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jikt.im

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, informal developer collective with a focus on software and utilities development. Their market position is niche and community-driven rather than commercial. Revenue streams and formal business operations are not evident from the site. The group maintains a presence on social media and GitHub, indicating active development and community interaction. The lack of formal policies and contact mechanisms suggests a low maturity level in business operations and compliance. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not indicated, and the group appears self-contained.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) and Cloudflare DNS, but no security headers or incident response contacts are present. Author emails are exposed in plain text, increasing spam risk. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is minimal and could be improved by implementing standard web security headers, privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Avoid exposing author email addresses in plain text; use contact forms or obfuscation techniques.
  4. Create an incident response or security contact page to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance website design and navigation for better user experience and professional appearance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
jiktim
Description
jiktim is a group of developers from around the world specializing in writing software, utilities, and apps of varying degrees of uselessness.
Key services
software development, utilities, apps
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Jekyll v3.10.0, normalize-css, FontAwesome 5.15.1, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Jekyll
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small developer/hacker group site with minimal professional polish.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found, indicating low compliance maturity.
  3. No contact forms or phone numbers; only social media and author emails visible.
  4. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  5. Content is safe and technology focused with no adult or questionable content.
  6. Site uses Jekyll static site generator and Cloudflare DNS.
  7. WHOIS data is consistent with domain age and usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Jekyll v3.10.0, a static site generator, using normalize.css and FontAwesome for styling and icons. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, likely providing CDN and DNS security benefits. The site loads external CSS from jsdelivr and fontawesome CDN, indicating reliance on third-party resources. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern but minimalistic, suitable for a small developer group site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jikt.im. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jikt.im.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.