Skip to main content

Security report for jiemas.org

接码 · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.jiemas.org operates as a free online SMS receiving platform offering temporary and virtual phone numbers primarily targeting Chinese-speaking users. It provides services that facilitate receiving verification codes online, supporting multiple international phone number regions. The site is built on WordPress and uses Matomo analytics and Baidu push scripts for tracking and SEO purposes. Despite active content updates and a broad range of posts related to gaming and software, the site lacks essential transparency elements such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query issues, which is common for this type of service but reduces trustworthiness. Security headers and best practices are minimal, and no explicit compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is evident. Overall, the site functions as a niche service with moderate technical implementation but requires significant improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jiemas.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets users needing temporary phone numbers for SMS verification, a niche but growing market segment often used for account registrations and online verifications. Its business model appears to be free access possibly monetized through affiliate marketing (e.g., sms-activate.org). The site content focuses on gaming, software downloads, and virtual phone number services, appealing to a tech-savvy audience. The lack of clear business registration and contact details limits its credibility. The extensive network of external linked domains suggests partnerships or advertising relationships with VPN and acceleration services, indicating a broader ecosystem targeting users requiring online anonymity or access to restricted content. Growth potential exists but is constrained by trust and regulatory compliance challenges.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, exposing it to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. No visible security or incident response policies are present, and no contact channels for abuse or security incidents are provided. The use of third-party scripts (Matomo, Baidu push) introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to protect users and improve regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
  5. Conduct a full security audit and implement best practices for data protection and user privacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
接码
Description
接码,免费在线短信接收平台，可以在线接收短信，接收短信验证码，显示迅速，定时更新号码库，验证码接收平台，最新国外接码平台，海量临时虚拟手机号云短信接码，拥有中国香港/美国/英国/德国/加拿大/马来西亚/菲律宾/印度尼西亚/泰国/新加坡/印度/俄罗斯/日本/韩国/法国/尼日利亚等电话号接码
Key services
online SMS receiving, temporary phone numbers, virtual phone numbers, verification code reception
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Matomo Analytics, jQuery (implied by WordPress), Emoji support scripts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Baidu push, Matomo analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based platform providing free online SMS receiving and virtual phone number services.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese with some English segments.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Site uses Matomo analytics and Baidu push scripts for tracking and SEO.
  6. Advertising includes affiliate links to sms-activate.org.
  7. No explicit security or privacy compliance information provided.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or query issues.
  9. Site content is safe and non-adult.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a custom theme 'maupassant-master'. It uses Matomo for analytics and Baidu push scripts for SEO and traffic monitoring. The site loads external resources over HTTPS, indicating basic SSL configuration. The design is basic with moderate mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site performance is moderate, with no major errors but some outdated or minimal optimization. The extensive use of external affiliate and partner links suggests a monetization strategy reliant on referrals. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jiemas.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jiemas.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.