Skip to main content

Security report for jenni.ai

Jenni AI · Education · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jenni AI is a small technology company specializing in AI-powered academic writing assistance. Their website presents a focused business model targeting students and academic users, offering AI tools to improve writing efficiency while maintaining user control. The company was founded in 2019 and operates in the education sector. Technically, the website is built using Framer, integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as PostHog, Segment, and Cookiebot, and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, though a cookie consent mechanism is implemented. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected but consistent with a legitimate startup profile, with no suspicious indicators. The website content is safe and appropriate for a general audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jenni.ai

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jenni AI occupies a niche market in academic AI assistance, leveraging AI technology to support writing tasks. Their business model likely revolves around SaaS or subscription-based access to AI tools. The company targets students and academic professionals, positioning itself as a specialized AI assistant. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is common for startups and does not raise concerns. The marketing ecosystem includes major analytics and advertising platforms, indicating a focus on user acquisition and engagement. The absence of direct contact information and formal policies suggests room for maturity in corporate transparency and compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has client transfer protection on the domain, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are published, which limits transparency in security management. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the surface for privacy risks, though cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents on the website.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jenni AI
Description
Jenni is your AI assistant for all things in your academic journey. We specialise in developing AI that helps you make your writing more efficient, while still keeping control.
Key services
AI writing assistance, academic writing support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, PostHog analytics, Segment analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Segment, HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Snapchat Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Bing Ads
Marketing tools
Segment, PostHog, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern analytics and marketing tools
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  4. No direct contact information or forms detected in HTML
  5. Domain uses privacy protection but is not suspicious
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Content is focused on academic AI assistance
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including PostHog, Segment, HubSpot, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from additional security hardening and formal compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jenni.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jenni.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.