Skip to main content

Security report for jekeshkumar.com

Jekesh Kumar · Technology · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jekesh Kumar is a skilled freelance WordPress developer and fixer specializing in creating and maintaining high-performing WordPress websites. The website positions him as a Top Rated Seller on Fiverr, offering services such as troubleshooting plugin conflicts, optimizing site performance, and enhancing security. The business targets WordPress site owners and small businesses seeking expert WordPress solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with the Astra theme and uses modern performance optimizations including Seraphinite Accelerator and Google Site Kit. The site is hosted by HOSTINGER operations, UAB and uses HTTPS with a clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating basic domain security. However, the domain WHOIS data shows an anomalous future creation date, which may be a data error. Security posture is decent with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jekeshkumar.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small freelance WordPress development service, leveraging platforms like Fiverr for client acquisition. It holds a strong market position as a Top Rated Seller, indicating positive client feedback and reliability. The business model is service-based, focusing on custom WordPress fixes and optimizations. The target customers are WordPress website owners needing technical assistance. The website content is well-branded and consistent, with clear service offerings and professional presentation. There is no indication of physical office locations or additional subsidiaries. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media presence and Fiverr platform integration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer is restricted. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, and security headers are absent, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable hosting and modern WordPress versions, reducing risk from outdated software. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking GDPR-related disclosures. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small freelance site but should be improved to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) and a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jekesh Kumar
Description
I'm Jekesh Kumar a skilled WordPress developer and fixer with a passion for creating and maintaining high-performing websites.
Key services
WordPress development, WordPress fixing, Troubleshooting plugin conflicts, Site performance optimization, Security enhancements, Custom WordPress solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP (implied by WordPress), jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Site Kit, Font Awesome 6, Astra Theme, Seraphinite Accelerator (performance plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress developer portfolio and service site
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  3. Uses modern WordPress theme and performance optimization plugins
  4. Includes Google Analytics and AdSense for tracking and monetization
  5. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses found
  6. Contact email found in structured data and visible on site
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with the Astra theme and uses several performance and SEO optimization plugins including Seraphinite Accelerator and Google Site Kit. It loads jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome 6 for UI elements. Google Tag Manager and AdSense scripts are integrated for analytics and monetization. The site is hosted by HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a reputable hosting provider. Performance is optimized with lazy loading and caching mechanisms. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. The domain WHOIS data shows an unusual future creation date, which should be verified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jekeshkumar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jekeshkumar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.