Skip to main content

Security report for jcloud.com

京东云 (JDCloud) · Technology · China

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

京东云 (JDCloud) is a leading cloud computing brand under JD Technology Group, offering a comprehensive suite of cloud services including public, private, and hybrid cloud solutions. Leveraging advanced technologies in AI, big data, IoT, and cloud computing, JDCloud serves enterprises, financial institutions, governments, and various industries with secure, reliable, and scalable cloud infrastructure and applications. The company holds a strong market position in China, ranking fourth in IaaS and exclusive cloud services, supported by authoritative certifications and a robust partner ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Vue.js and supports advanced security protocols including TLS 1.3. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, providing a professional user experience. Security posture is strong with valid SSL, no detected vulnerabilities, and multiple security best practices, though improvements like HSTS and OCSP stapling are recommended. Privacy compliance is moderate with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, JDCloud presents a credible, professional, and secure digital presence aligned with its enterprise-grade cloud offerings.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jcloud.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jcloud.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JDCloud operates as a comprehensive cloud service provider targeting a broad spectrum of industries including technology, energy, transportation, finance, retail, and government. Its business model revolves around delivering cloud infrastructure, security, AI, big data, and developer tools to enterprise and institutional clients. The company benefits from strong market positioning in China, supported by a wide range of products and solutions tailored to various business needs. JDCloud's ecosystem includes a cloud marketplace, developer portal, and extensive partner network, enhancing its competitive advantage. The presence of multiple authoritative certifications and customer case studies further strengthens its market credibility. The company emphasizes digital transformation and cost efficiency for its clients, leveraging JD Technology Group's resources and expertise.

Security posture

JDCloud demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced via a valid SSL certificate supporting modern protocols (TLS 1.3 and 1.2). The absence of weak cipher suites and subdomain takeover vulnerabilities indicates good security hygiene. The website lacks some advanced security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and OCSP stapling, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web threats. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The company holds multiple security certifications including ISO 27001, CSA STAR, and ISO 27018, reflecting compliance with industry standards. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests an area for improvement in transparency and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and reliability.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate XSS, MIME sniffing, and clickjacking attacks.
  4. Introduce a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
  5. Implement explicit cookie consent mechanisms to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js, Swiper.js, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced interactivity and user experience. It is hosted on JDCloud infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and preloading of critical resources for fast load times. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The technical implementation reflects a mature digital platform with room for improvement in accessibility and advanced security features. No significant technical debt or performance bottlenecks were identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jcloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jcloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.