Skip to main content

Security report for jaunradesnams.lv

Ventspils Jaunrades nams · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ventspils Jaunrades nams is a local educational and cultural institution based in Ventspils, Latvia, offering creative educational programs, including a planetarium and observatory. The website serves as an information portal for children, educators, and the local community, providing schedules, news, and event details. The business model is non-profit and focused on community education and cultural enrichment. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a standard theme and plugins, including Revolution Slider and jQuery, but uses an outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks. The site is mobile optimized and has a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and updated libraries. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy visible. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its purpose but could improve security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaunradesnams.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution targets school children and educators primarily in the Ventspils region, offering interest education programs, summer camps, and planetarium shows. It maintains partnerships with local government and European Union entities, as evidenced by linked domains. The business operates as a small-sized non-profit educational entity with a focus on cultural and scientific education. The website content is consistent with its mission and audience, with active social media channels supporting community engagement. Revenue streams likely include public funding and program fees. Growth indicators include regular updates and event announcements. The partnership ecosystem includes local government and EU organizations, enhancing credibility and resource access.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced, which is essential. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.4) is a notable vulnerability that could be exploited. No visible forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for security maturity. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of cookie consent and limited privacy policy details. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and enhance privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ventspils Jaunrades nams
Description
Ventspils Jaunrades nams is an educational and cultural institution offering creative and educational programs, including a planetarium and observatory. It provides interest education programs, methodological materials, and organizes events and summer camps primarily for school children.
Key services
Interest education programs, Planetarium and observatory shows, Summer camps for children, Educational materials and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.15, jQuery 1.12.4, Revolution Slider 5.2.5, Google Fonts (Oswald, PT Sans), FontAwesome 4.0.3
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational and cultural institution site.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with some English and Russian language options for the planetarium section.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; no visible data collection forms.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with phone, emails, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube official pages.
  6. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.15 using the Avada theme and Revolution Slider plugin. It loads Google Fonts (Oswald and PT Sans) and FontAwesome icons. The jQuery version is outdated (1.12.4), which is a security concern. The site uses asynchronous loading for some scripts, improving performance. The site is mobile responsive with a clear layout and navigation. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links present. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaunradesnams.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaunradesnams.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.