Skip to main content

Security report for janauto.lv

SIA JANAUTO · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA JANAUTO is a well-established driving school based in Cēsis, Latvia, with over two decades of experience providing driver education for various vehicle categories including professional driver qualifications. The website reflects a focused business model targeting individuals seeking in-person driving lessons and professional certification in the Vidzeme region. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and a consistent brand image. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS using the Helix3 framework and common web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, offering a moderate level of performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching janauto.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
95
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the education and transportation sectors, focusing on driver training services. Its market position as one of the oldest driving schools in the region provides a competitive advantage. The business model is straightforward, relying on in-person training sessions and professional qualification courses. Revenue streams likely come from course fees. The website does not indicate partnerships or subsidiaries, and no advanced marketing or tracking tools are employed. The clear presentation of contact details and professional content supports business credibility. Growth indicators or strategic partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms collecting sensitive data were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience across devices.
  4. Consider publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information to foster security transparency.
  5. Regularly review and update website technologies and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA JANAUTO
Description
SIA JANAUTO is one of the oldest driving schools in Cēsis with 22 years of experience, offering driver training for categories B, C, D, E, and professional driver qualification code 95 in the Vidzeme region. Training is conducted only in person.
Key services
Driver training for categories B, C, D, E, Professional driver qualification code 95 training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Joomla!, Helix3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href https://janauto.lv/

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone number.
  5. Website uses Joomla CMS with Helix3 framework and common web libraries.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed.
  7. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  8. Content is relevant and professional for a local driving school business.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external links found.
  10. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Joomla CMS with the Helix3 framework, leveraging jQuery, Bootstrap, and Font Awesome for UI components. The HTML structure is valid and includes appropriate meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious or minimalistic approach. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but has room for modernization and enhanced user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with janauto.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review janauto.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.