Skip to main content

Security report for jalatvia.lv

Junior Achievement Latvia · Education · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

61/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Junior Achievement Latvia is a well-established non-profit educational organization founded in 1991, focusing on practical business education and leadership development for youth in Latvia. The website serves as a portal for students, teachers, and schools to access programs such as student companies, leadership initiatives, and career shadowing events. The organization maintains partnerships with reputable entities such as Swedbank and the Latvian Investment and Development Agency, enhancing its credibility and reach. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK. It uses HTTPS and has a moderate performance profile with basic mobile optimization. However, it lacks some modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and security enhancement. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices like HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the presence of clear contact information, privacy policy, and partner logos supports trustworthiness. The site does not currently provide explicit security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and serves its educational mission effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and transparency around security policies would further strengthen its posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jalatvia.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Junior Achievement Latvia holds a leading position in Latvia's educational sector for business and entrepreneurship training. Its business model as a non-profit focuses on delivering educational programs and events that foster youth entrepreneurship and leadership. The organization targets students from primary to secondary education, teachers, and schools, leveraging partnerships with financial institutions and government agencies. The website content and partner logos indicate a stable ecosystem and active engagement in regional and international projects. Growth indicators include regular events, webinars, and certification programs. The organization's longevity since 1991 and extensive reach to over 120,000 youth and 350 schools underscore its market presence and influence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities in the front-end code. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The absence of a cookie consent banner and explicit privacy compliance notices may expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit educational site but could be improved with standard best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with EU GDPR and ePrivacy Directive requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information and ensure domain registration details are accessible and consistent with organizational identity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Junior Achievement Latvia
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Junior Achievement Latvia
Description
Junior Achievement Latvia is the largest educational organization in Latvia focused on practical business education in schools. It offers programs such as student companies, leadership programs, and career shadowing days to foster entrepreneurship and leadership among youth.
Key services
Student company programs, Leadership programs, Career shadowing events, Teacher training, Educational conferences and webinars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Slick Carousel 1.8.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WAF or blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  4. Privacy policy is present and linked as a PDF document.
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  6. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly provided in footer.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  8. Use of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking.
  9. Multiple partner logos indicate established partnerships.
  10. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components, Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking, and Google Fonts for typography. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a secure transport layer. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization, especially for mobile devices where the experience is basic. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indicators, suggesting a custom or legacy build. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's educational mission but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jalatvia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jalatvia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.