Skip to main content

Security report for iv.lt

UAB "Interneto vizija" · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 3 critical or high findings in Network security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB "Interneto vizija" operates a professional web hosting and domain registration service primarily targeting Lithuanian businesses and individuals. Their offerings include web hosting, domain registration, SSL certificates, and VPS servers, positioning themselves as a leading hosting service provider in Lithuania. The website is well-structured, with professional branding and a clear focus on their core services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The presence of Google reCAPTCHA enhances bot protection, and analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar are used extensively with user consent.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iv.lt

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the Lithuanian market with a medium-sized business model focused on technology services. Their business model revolves around providing reliable and secure hosting infrastructure with professional customer support. The website reflects a consistent brand image and leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. Social media presence across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube supports their marketing efforts. The lack of visible direct contact information on the homepage suggests contact details may be located elsewhere or require user interaction. The absence of WHOIS data is typical for .lt domains but slightly reduces transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided content, and no security.txt or incident response contact information was found. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. Regular updates and security best practices are recommended to maintain a strong security posture. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress components and third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB "Interneto vizija"
Description
Interneto vizija – svetainių talpinimas, domenų registravimas, SSL sertifikatai ir VPS serveriai Lietuvoje. Greitas, patikimas ir saugus hostingas su profesionaliu aptarnavimu.
Key services
Web hosting, Domain registration, SSL certificates, VPS servers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Sales Manago
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Sales Manago, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content
  5. Strong use of analytics and marketing tools with clear consent
  6. Professional branding and consistent use of company identity
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is common for .lt domains but reduces transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO Premium with structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for rich search results. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iv.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iv.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.