Skip to main content

Security report for itvet.co.uk

ITVET · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITVET is a UK-based technology partner specializing in IT services and technology solutions for businesses. The website positions the company as a trusted technology partner, targeting organizations seeking professional IT support and services. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress CMS, enhanced with SEO tools like Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates moderate technical maturity with good mobile optimization and performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and Google Consent Mode configured to restrict ad and analytics storage by default, though security headers and explicit privacy policies are lacking. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itvet.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing IT services and solutions primarily to business clients. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on technology partnership rather than product sales. Market positioning is as a trusted partner, leveraging digital marketing tools to reach its audience. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, indicating a small-sized enterprise with a focus on quality service delivery. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google Consent Mode to limit data collection by default, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to enhance incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ITVET
Description
ITVET is a technology partner company providing IT services and solutions.
Key services
technology partnership, IT services, technology solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, Rocket Lazy Load Scripts
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Consent Mode with ad and analytics storage denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query on subdomain instead of domain.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  6. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Website content is professional and technology service oriented.
  8. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML content.
  9. HTTPS is enforced as indicated by script sources and links.
  10. Google Consent Mode is configured to deny ad and analytics storage by default.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The presence of Rocket Lazy Load Scripts indicates efforts to optimize script loading and improve performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses modern web fonts. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through enhanced caching and resource optimization. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, with no evident legacy technologies or deprecated libraries. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itvet.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itvet.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.