Skip to main content

Security report for itrinity.com

itrinity · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

itrinity is a technology company specializing in building and acquiring a portfolio of highly profitable SaaS businesses with millions of users worldwide. Founded in 2014, itrinity has demonstrated consistent profitability and growth, focusing on efficient portfolio management and expansion through acquisitions. Their portfolio includes well-known SaaS brands such as Mangools, Email List Verify, Uptime Robot, Warmup Inbox, and GeoTargetly, serving notable clients including Apple, Cisco, BMW, and NASA. The company targets SaaS users, investors, and business buyers, positioning itself as a fast-growing product factory in the SaaS industry. Technically, itrinity operates a modern WordPress-based website using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, although some accessibility features are basic. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers and publicly disclosed security policies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, indicating room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, itrinity presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business credibility and a clear market position. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response details slightly lowers its privacy compliance and security posture scores. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itrinity.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

itrinity operates in the technology sector, focusing on SaaS business acquisition and operation. Their business model revolves around building and acquiring profitable SaaS products, leveraging growth through portfolio expansion. The company has a medium size with a decade of market presence and a portfolio of eight fast-growing SaaS businesses. Their competitive advantage lies in operational efficiency, profitability since inception, and a diversified portfolio with reputable clients. The company maintains partnerships and subsidiaries in the SaaS ecosystem, enhancing its market reach and service offerings. Growth indicators include consistent EBITDA growth and expanding user base. The company’s strategic focus on acquiring and scaling SaaS businesses positions it well in the competitive SaaS market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and SSL properly configured. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance indicators or data protection officer contact information. The security culture appears basic, with opportunities to enhance incident response readiness and user trust through improved security disclosures and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to enhance protection.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Add incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  6. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards.
  7. Consider adding phone contact information and physical address to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
itrinity
Description
itrinity runs a fast-growing portfolio of highly profitable SaaS businesses with millions of users across the globe. They have been profitable since day 1 and have grown by over 30% in EBITDA (YoY) for the last 10 years. Their vision is to build and operate an ever-growing portfolio of highly profitable SaaS businesses efficiently, fulfilling the unreached potential of each product and expanding the portfolio with new acquisitions.
Key services
SaaS business acquisition, SaaS business operation, Portfolio management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS portfolio operator
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact information is limited to email and contact forms, no phone or physical address found
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content
  7. SSL is enabled and domain uses Cloudflare DNS
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Multiple SaaS brands and products showcased with external links
  10. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, providing performance and security benefits. The site uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons, with responsive design for mobile devices. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. SEO is well addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were identified in the source. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals but can be enhanced with additional security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itrinity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itrinity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.