Skip to main content

Security report for itqgroup.lv

itqgroup.lv · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website itqgroup.lv offers specialized professional services focused on registering IT companies in Estonia, including accounting, legal support, virtual office services, and company closure assistance. The business targets IT entrepreneurs and companies looking to establish or relocate their IT operations to Estonia, positioning itself as a niche service provider in this domain. The website content is well-structured and professionally presented, emphasizing a personalized and efficient approach to company formation and support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPForms and All in One SEO, ensuring a modern and manageable platform. The site is HTTPS secured, mobile optimized, and includes SEO best practices, although it lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Performance is moderate, and accessibility is basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS but lacks additional security headers and formal privacy or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the analysis. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, but the site content and domain name align with a legitimate business offering IT company registration services. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for its business niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and transparent WHOIS data to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itqgroup.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting IT company formation and support services in Estonia. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise in Estonian business law, taxation, and international standards, combined with a personalized approach tailored to client needs. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees for company registration, accounting, legal consultations, virtual office rentals, and company closure assistance. The target customer segment includes startups, IT entrepreneurs, and businesses seeking to relocate or expand into Estonia. The website indicates a small-sized operation with a focused service offering and no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include a professional web presence and a clear value proposition, but lack of social media or certifications may limit broader market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Data collection is limited to a contact form, with no visible analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations, which could pose legal risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small service website but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding verified WHOIS information or domain privacy disclosures to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
itqgroup.lv
Description
Register your IT company in Estonia with the help of professionals. Accounting, legal support for a successful start and growth of your IT business.
Key services
IT company registration in Estonia, Accounting services for IT companies, Virtual office and contact person service, Legal support specialized in IT law, Company closure assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, WPForms, All in One SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on IT company registration and related professional services in Estonia.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and a contact form but no phone numbers or physical addresses.
  5. No social media links or certifications displayed.
  6. Website uses WordPress with common plugins like WPForms and All in One SEO.
  7. SSL is enabled with HTTPS and site loads securely.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond form validation scripts.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins including WPForms for form handling and All in One SEO for search engine optimization. The site uses jQuery and standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript). The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. No advanced frameworks or CDNs are detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and analytics integration, indicating room for technical modernization and security enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itqgroup.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itqgroup.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.