Skip to main content

Security report for itii-alsace.fr

Institut des Techniques d'Ingénieur de l'Industrie d'Alsace · Education · France

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITII Alsace is a specialized educational institute focused on training engineers for the industrial sector in the Alsace region of France. The website offers detailed information on apprenticeship programs for young people under 30, continuing education for salaried employees, and training services for companies. The business model revolves around providing industry-relevant educational services and facilitating apprenticeships. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the professional content and social media presence support legitimacy. Privacy and terms of service pages are not clearly found, indicating room for improvement in compliance. Overall, ITII Alsace presents a credible and professional online presence suitable for its educational mission. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and terms policies, and performing regular security audits to maintain compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching itii-alsace.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institute occupies a niche regional market in industrial engineering education, targeting apprentices, employees, and companies. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized training programs aligned with industry needs and partnerships with local companies and schools. Revenue streams likely include tuition fees, government or regional funding, and corporate training contracts. The website's integration with apprenticeship offer platforms and guides indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include updated guides and active social media engagement. Strategic observations suggest focusing on digital compliance and security to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of comprehensive security headers and absence of explicit security or incident response policies indicate gaps. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications was found. The website does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries visibly. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not present, which could be improved to meet GDPR and NIS2 standards. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and communicate incident response procedures and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to enhance GDPR compliance and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Institut des Techniques d'Ingénieur de l'Industrie d'Alsace
Description
ITII Alsace is an educational institute focused on training engineers for the industrial sector in Alsace, France. It offers apprenticeship and continuing education programs targeting young apprentices, salaried employees, and companies.
Key services
Alternance (apprenticeship) training, Continuing education for salaried employees, Support for companies in industrial training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor page builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, Search & Filter Pro plugin, Cookie Notice plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is focused on industrial engineering education and training
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Elementor page builder, leveraging jQuery and several plugins for forms, search filtering, and cookie management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and marketing analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern fonts and CSS. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and privacy compliance require attention to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with itii-alsace.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review itii-alsace.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.