Skip to main content

Security report for iteca.lv

SIA ITECA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ITECA is a Latvian IT service provider specializing in comprehensive IT support including computer and server administration, network management, hosting, and office equipment servicing. With nearly 20 years of experience, the company offers flexible cooperation models such as administration contracts, subscriptions, and one-time services, targeting businesses requiring reliable IT infrastructure support. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions and contact options. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap 4 and includes Google reCAPTCHA for form security. While HTTPS is enforced and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, security headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the visible business information and contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid technical foundation and business presence with moderate tracking and good privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iteca.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT support and infrastructure services for businesses in Latvia. Its business model revolves around service contracts and flexible subscription plans, enabling clients to choose tailored IT support solutions. The presence of physical office addresses, registration numbers, and direct contact details indicates a transparent and established business. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager suggests an interest in understanding customer behavior and improving service delivery. The company’s market position appears stable within its local market, leveraging nearly two decades of experience. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company’s offerings cover a broad range of IT services, positioning it as a one-stop IT support provider for SMEs and possibly larger organizations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on its contact forms, which are positive security measures. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a compliance gap especially under GDPR and NIS2 frameworks. The cookie consent banner and privacy policy demonstrate GDPR awareness and compliance efforts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish detailed security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "ITECA"
Registration number
40103506966
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA ITECA
Description
ITECA provides IT support services including computer and server administration, repair, hosting, network administration, video surveillance system administration, office equipment servicing, and IT project development. The company has nearly 20 years of experience and offers flexible cooperation models such as administration contracts, subscriptions, and one-time services.
Key services
Computer and server administration, Local network administration, Video surveillance system administration, Office equipment servicing, Hosting and virtual server rental, IT system optimization and protection, User technical support, Project development and procurement organization, Computer hardware sales and repair
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Font Awesome 5.13.0
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based IT service provider site with comprehensive service descriptions.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided including phone numbers, email, physical address, and contact form.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking with consent banner.
  8. Site is well structured with clear navigation and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery 3.7.1 for scripting. It leverages Google Fonts, Font Awesome icons, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site loads external scripts asynchronously to improve performance. The presence of a cookie consent plugin indicates attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the hosting provider is not identifiable from the HTML content. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and more explicit technical documentation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small to medium-sized IT service provider.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iteca.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iteca.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.