Skip to main content

Security report for isf-eras.org

International School Sport Federation (ISF) via Domains By Proxy, LLC · Education · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The ISF ERAS website serves as a registration and login portal for the International School Sport Federation's event management platform. It targets schools, sports organizations, and participants involved in school sports events. The site provides user account creation and login functionalities, with confirmation emails upon approval. The business operates in the education and non-profit sectors, focusing on facilitating school sports event participation internationally. The domain is registered since 2017 and uses privacy protection services, which is typical for organizations of this nature. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and Gravity Forms plugin for form handling. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is hosted via GoDaddy, with domain control nameservers. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, but SEO and accessibility features are basic. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain registration locks enabled, indicating good domain management. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as CSP or HSTS are detected. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. Forms are handled via Gravity Forms, which is a secure and widely used plugin. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers and policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to implement privacy and cookie policies, enable DNSSEC, add security headers, and provide vulnerability disclosure information. These steps would enhance compliance, user trust, and security maturity, aligning the site with best practices for organizations handling user registrations and personal data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching isf-eras.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention isf-eras.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
0
Customers
23
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for isf-eras.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ISF ERAS operates as a niche platform within the international school sports federation ecosystem, providing essential registration and event management services. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on school sports and its affiliation with the International School Sport Federation brand. The business model revolves around membership and event participation facilitation, targeting schools and sports organizations globally. Revenue streams are likely derived from event fees or federation membership dues, although not explicitly stated. The target customer segments include educational institutions, sports event organizers, and student athletes. Growth indicators are limited from the site content but the domain age and professional setup suggest a stable operation. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but the use of third-party services like GoDaddy and Gravity Forms indicates reliance on established service providers. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved privacy and security transparency to strengthen market position and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate level of security maturity. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes protective locks, reducing risks of domain hijacking. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS represents gaps that could be exploited by attackers. The use of Gravity Forms for user input is a positive security control, mitigating risks of injection attacks. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear, with no contact channels for security issues provided. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls. Addressing these gaps would reduce attack surface and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing incident response contact channels and data protection officer information if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
International School Sport Federation (ISF) via Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
The website is for ISF ERAS, a platform related to the International School Sport Federation, providing user account registration and login for event or sports related activities. It targets schools, sports organizations, and participants in school sports events.
Key services
User account registration, Event registration and management, Information dissemination for ISF ERAS events
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Gravity Forms for form security
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and Gravity Forms plugin.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found on homepage or linked pages.
  3. Contact email is a generic registration@isfsports.org email, consistent with organization.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found in content.
  5. Site uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. Domain is privacy protected but registered since 2017 with GoDaddy registrar.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Site content is minimal but functional for login and registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using the Divi theme, which offers flexibility and a professional appearance. Gravity Forms is used for form management, providing secure and user-friendly data collection. The site loads moderate external resources including Google Fonts and Google Analytics scripts, which may impact performance but are industry standard. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. However, SEO optimization is minimal, with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or enhanced semantic markup evident. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. Hosting via GoDaddy with domaincontrol.com nameservers is standard but could be improved with enhanced DNS security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with isf-eras.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review isf-eras.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.