Skip to main content

Security report for irv.lv

Ilūkstes Raiņa vidusskola · Education · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ilūkstes Raiņa vidusskola is an educational institution based in Latvia, providing secondary education services to the local community. The website serves as an information portal for students, parents, and staff, featuring news, events, and school governance details. The site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Elementor, indicating a modern and maintainable technical infrastructure. The content is primarily in Latvian and targets a regional audience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and public security policies, which suggests room for improvement in security posture. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no detected privacy or cookie policies, which could pose compliance risks. Overall, the website appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching irv.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The school operates in the education sector, focusing on secondary education in the Ilūkste region of Latvia. Its business model is typical for public or private educational institutions, relying on government or community funding rather than commercial revenue streams. The website supports community engagement and information dissemination but does not appear to monetize directly. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers on the main page may limit direct outreach but aligns with typical school communication practices. The use of WordPress and SEO plugins suggests an intent to maintain visibility and accessibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting insight into user behavior. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms indicates non-compliance with GDPR cookie requirements. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard web security best practices and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Establish and publish security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Monitor and verify WHOIS data to ensure domain registration legitimacy and update contact information publicly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ilūkstes Raiņa vidusskola
Description
Ilūkstes Raiņa vidusskola
Key services
Secondary education, School events and news, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, Thim Elementor Kit, Contact Form 7, Swiper.js, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based educational site for Ilūkstes Raiņa vidusskola in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local community and students.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected in the scanned content.
  5. No security or incident response policies publicly visible.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided content.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. Site uses modern web technologies and SEO plugins indicating active maintenance.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible platform. It uses additional plugins like Contact Form 7 for forms and Thim Elementor Kit for enhanced UI components. The site loads multiple CSS and JS libraries including Swiper.js and Font Awesome for icons. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO metadata present. Accessibility features are basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not visible from the content. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Overall, the technical infrastructure is sound but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with irv.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review irv.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.