Skip to main content

Security report for ironmountain.com

Iron Mountain Incorporated · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Iron Mountain Incorporated is a leading global enterprise specializing in information management services, including digital business solutions, data centers, asset lifecycle management, shredding, and records management. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring secure and compliant data protection and management solutions. With a long-standing market presence since 1951, Iron Mountain holds a strong position in the technology and information management sector, supported by multiple certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, showcasing their extensive service portfolio and commitment to security and compliance. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, integrated with various analytics and marketing platforms such as HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices and performance. Security measures are robust, featuring HTTPS, strong security headers, and secure form handling, although the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure program is noted. The security posture is strong, with clear policies and incident response contacts available, indicating a mature security culture. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable or protected, which slightly reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the risk profile is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing transparency and maintaining up-to-date security practices. Strategic recommendations include establishing a public vulnerability disclosure program, improving incident response visibility, and continuing to monitor third-party dependencies for vulnerabilities. These steps will further strengthen Iron Mountain's security posture and trust with customers and partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ironmountain.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iron Mountain operates primarily in the B2B sector, serving industries such as technology, government, healthcare, and finance. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, global reach, and strong compliance certifications. Revenue streams are diversified across physical records management, digital transformation services, and secure data center operations. The company targets medium to large enterprises requiring secure information lifecycle management. Growth indicators include expansion into digital business solutions and data center services. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing customer engagement and operational efficiency. Strategic observations highlight Iron Mountain's focus on security, compliance, and innovation to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

Iron Mountain demonstrates a mature security posture with multiple industry-standard certifications such as ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, and FedRAMP. The website enforces HTTPS and implements key security headers, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Secure forms and validated inputs indicate attention to data protection. Incident response contacts and security policies are publicly available, supporting transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is evident through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. The main gap is the lack of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could enhance community engagement and proactive vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a public vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Enhance incident response information visibility on the website to build customer trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Increase transparency around data retention policies and privacy compliance measures.
  5. Continue investing in mobile and accessibility improvements to maintain excellent user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Iron Mountain Incorporated
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Iron Mountain Incorporated
Description
Iron Mountain provides information management services including digital business solutions, data centers, asset lifecycle management, shredding, and records management. Staffed with trained and vetted professionals, the company helps protect, unlock, and extend the value of client work.
Key services
Digital business solutions, Data centers, Asset lifecycle management, Shredding services, Records management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Algolia Autocomplete
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Analytics, Facebook Analytics, Bing Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, CaliberMind, ListenLoop, Algolia
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional and comprehensive content with strong branding
  3. Multiple security and privacy policies present and well implemented
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  6. WHOIS data missing or protected, which is a minor trust concern
  7. Strong security posture with modern headers and HTTPS
  8. Good mobile and accessibility optimization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, supported by a CMS likely Sitecore. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and Algolia for search functionality. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and implements strong security headers. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended. Opportunities exist to improve hosting provider transparency and further optimize load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust, scalable, and secure digital presence aligned with enterprise standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium4 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ironmountain.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ironmountain.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.