Skip to main content

Security report for iptrack.io

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 4 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website iptrack.io provides a secure login interface for accessing an IP tracking dashboard service. The business appears to be a small technology company founded in 2016, offering IP tracking and analytics services primarily to business users. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as Blazor Server, Bootstrap 5, and integrates third-party services like Stripe for payments and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is hosted with domain control services and uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is consistent with technology service providers. Security posture is moderate with secure login forms and HTTPS implied, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iptrack.io

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Iptrack.io operates in the niche market of IP tracking and analytics, targeting businesses and professionals requiring detailed IP data insights. The business model is subscription or account-based SaaS, with a focus on dashboard access and user account management. The company benefits from a moderate market position with a technology-focused service offering. The use of privacy-protected domain registration is typical for tech companies. The absence of visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials suggests opportunities for building stronger market credibility. The integration of payment processing via Stripe indicates monetization through paid plans or services. The company’s ecosystem includes third-party analytics and tracking tools, supporting marketing and user engagement efforts.

Security posture

The security maturity of iptrack.io is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and secure password input fields, which are fundamental security measures. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which may impact GDPR compliance and user trust. The absence of incident response contact channels or security policies limits the ability to handle security incidents effectively. Third-party scripts are used extensively, which requires ongoing vulnerability management. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but should enhance its security framework and transparency to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies visible on the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
Provides secure access to a dashboard for IP tracking services.
Key services
IP tracking, Dashboard access, User account management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Blazor Server, Stripe.js, Google Analytics, WhoisVisiting tracking
Frameworks
Blazor
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Secure login form with password input
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WhoisVisiting
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WhoisVisiting
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for a SaaS IP tracking dashboard.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies on the login page.
  3. Uses modern web technologies including Blazor and Bootstrap 5.
  4. Includes multiple third-party tracking scripts.
  5. No explicit contact information or security policies found.
  6. Domain is privacy protected but registered since 2016, indicating established presence.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern technology stack including Blazor Server for interactive UI, Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, and jQuery for legacy support. Payment integration is handled via Stripe.js, and user analytics are collected through Google Analytics and WhoisVisiting tracking pixels. Hosting is managed through domain control services with DNS servers ns65.domaincontrol.com and ns66.domaincontrol.com. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted libraries. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built. Technical risks include missing security headers and absence of visible privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iptrack.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iptrack.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.