Skip to main content

Security report for ipro.lv

iPro SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iPro SIA is a Latvian IT service provider specializing in data storage, virtualization, IT security, and data center solutions. The company targets businesses seeking to optimize their IT infrastructure and improve security and efficiency. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure includes common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, integrated via JavaScript. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers, indicating room for security enhancements. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, though terms of service and security policies are absent. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Contact information and social media presence support business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and accessibility could further strengthen the company's digital trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ipro.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ipro.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iPro SIA operates in the Latvian technology sector, providing essential IT services focused on infrastructure and security. The company appears well-positioned in the local market with a clear service portfolio and active engagement through events and news updates. Their business model centers on consulting and delivering IT solutions to enterprises. The presence of multiple analytics and marketing tools suggests a focus on customer engagement and lead generation. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides transparent contact details, enhancing trust. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating an independent operation. The company leverages partnerships with major IT vendors as indicated by event participation and news content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security incidents. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks if not properly managed. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iPro SIA
Registration number
40003521916
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iPro SIA
Description
iPro helps clients reduce costs, increase information security levels, and improve business process efficiency by combining business knowledge with information technology expertise.
Key services
Data storage, Virtualization, IT security, Data centers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Sumo, DIRcms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sumo
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Sumo, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with multilingual options (English, Lithuanian).
  3. Company provides IT services focused on data storage, virtualization, IT security, and data centers.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with clear user information.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, indicating moderate user tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn is active.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on DIRcms and uses jQuery along with multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Sumo. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern frontend frameworks or advanced CMS features, indicating potential technical debt. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium25 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +8Medium25 findingsView report
  3. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  4. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  5. 42/100High22 findingsView report
  6. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  7. 61/100Medium32 findingsView report
  8. 61/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ipro.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ipro.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.